|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 30, 2016 3:43:53 GMT
I'm off everyone. Thank you for the conversation. I should be more stable in my posting once more. Good night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 3:44:48 GMT
Thank you. I knew I liked those two. And gosh - that's interesting about the porn industry. Very sad also. Yet I'm sure one must be tough to withstand the rigors of super stardom without the shattering. Withstanding the shattering and continuing to perform at such a high level seems nearly super human. Perhaps you can say you are creating entertainment "super soldiers." So regarding Jim Carrey and Will Ferrell, why have they not been removed from the spotlight if the shattering has been unsuccessful? Are they deemed to be more valuable in the spotlight? Jim Carrey seems to do a bit of spiritual teaching and speaking. Is he not deemed a threat? Do his handlers not care as long as he keeps the message he sends to the love and light end of the spectrum? I'm sorry Andrea, I should have finished the first sentence. 'Resisted until they couldn't', would have been less confusing. No good can come from facing the trauma-based modalities of several programmers and an un-shattered celebrity would never be allowed to have as much spotlight as these two.
Unlike many celebs who get to utilize their 'core persona' in non-vital exchanges (with fans for example), these fellows are usually triggered to an alter. No one gets to see the 'real them' except on rare, private occasions.
Is this, because they were so resistant to shattering, that their core personas are not trusted? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 3:45:42 GMT
I'm sorry Andrea, I should have finished the first sentence. 'Resisted until they couldn't', would have been less confusing. No good can come from facing the trauma-based modalities of several programmers and an un-shattered celebrity would never be allowed to have as much spotlight as these two.
Unlike many celebs who get to utilize their 'core persona' in non-vital exchanges (with fans for example), these fellows are usually triggered to an alter. No one gets to see the 'real them' except on rare, private occasions.
Oh, bummer. I guess one can only resist so much. But it does make sense now. I guess they could not be trusted at all so were almost over programmed? Wowser. Well, I am going to retire for the night. I hope you both have a peaceful sleep - goodnight Sir Jos and M'lady Kayli <3 Goodnight, Andrea.  |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 3:46:23 GMT
I'm off everyone. Thank you for the conversation. I should be more stable in my posting once more. Good night. Nice to hear that. Good night, Sir Jos.  |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 30, 2016 3:48:49 GMT
A
L
E
X
A
N
D
A
R
I
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 30, 2016 3:50:56 GMT
There's no 'handling' really. Assets are monitored similarly to how sleepers might be but not for potential 'breaks'. They're already broken. Mostly they're watched to see if they're going to overcome the meltdown and perhaps have some greater value. Ah... I see what you were getting at before - failed A-listers becoming porn-stars. So, it is possible to go from being a porn star to being an A-lister? Is porn-star, the result of a failed shattering? I think you already confirmed this, but I'm trying to see if I have that right. What role does sex tend to play in shattering, if any? I think we talked about this on your original GLP thread - that it's not necessary. But I don't precisely recall. Some porn stars are a result of failed shattering. There's no obvious way to tell who is who.
Returning to legitimacy is possible for a discarded asset if they show improvement.
Sex can be a part of shattering for its ability to impart violation and as a stimulant (dopamine).
Let's not discuss sex-kitten programming.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 30, 2016 3:53:19 GMT
I'm sorry Andrea, I should have finished the first sentence. 'Resisted until they couldn't', would have been less confusing. No good can come from facing the trauma-based modalities of several programmers and an un-shattered celebrity would never be allowed to have as much spotlight as these two.
Unlike many celebs who get to utilize their 'core persona' in non-vital exchanges (with fans for example), these fellows are usually triggered to an alter. No one gets to see the 'real them' except on rare, private occasions.
Is this, because they were so resistant to shattering, that their core personas are not trusted? All of this, anything I impart about these assets is hearsay. I should have added that caveat in the beginning. To my understanding the cores present wild mood swings - unstable. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 4:28:33 GMT
Ah... I see what you were getting at before - failed A-listers becoming porn-stars. So, it is possible to go from being a porn star to being an A-lister? Is porn-star, the result of a failed shattering? I think you already confirmed this, but I'm trying to see if I have that right. What role does sex tend to play in shattering, if any? I think we talked about this on your original GLP thread - that it's not necessary. But I don't precisely recall. Some porn stars are a result of failed shattering. There's no obvious way to tell who is who.
Returning to legitimacy is possible for a discarded asset if they show improvement.
Sex can be a part of shattering for its ability to impart violation and as a stimulant (dopamine).
Let's not discuss sex-kitten programming.
Uhm, I imagine its rather an unpleseant topic. Do you think, the reverse is also true for pornstars, that they get in it thinking or being promised true legitimate fame, and then they get sort of roped in and used? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 8:15:17 GMT
How do you feel about the paparazzi and do you think your clients hate the attention or do they crave it? Do you guys go out of your way to preserve privacy for your assets or do you use publicity as the situation demands? Are any paparazzi aware of the darker parts of psychology in hollywood?
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 30, 2016 10:35:59 GMT
How do celebs really feel about fans? Is it at all mixed? People go positively insane over superstars, screaming and crying as if they were meeting a demigod in the flesh. That used to annoy me when I was younger, because I am kind of insubordinate and it annoyed me when people worship other humans as if they didn't pee and fart like the rest of humanity. Anyway point being - of course celebs love their fans because without fans they don't have fame. But is it a patronizing kind of affection for fans, a put-on or a facade, or is it really genuine?
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 31, 2016 21:45:28 GMT
Some porn stars are a result of failed shattering. There's no obvious way to tell who is who.
Returning to legitimacy is possible for a discarded asset if they show improvement.
Sex can be a part of shattering for its ability to impart violation and as a stimulant (dopamine).
Let's not discuss sex-kitten programming.
Uhm, I imagine its rather an unpleseant topic. Do you think, the reverse is also true for pornstars, that they get in it thinking or being promised true legitimate fame, and then they get sort of roped in and used? Most certainly. |
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 31, 2016 21:49:02 GMT
How do you feel about the paparazzi and do you think your clients hate the attention or do they crave it? Do you guys go out of your way to preserve privacy for your assets or do you use publicity as the situation demands? Are any paparazzi aware of the darker parts of psychology in hollywood? I would imagine that paparazzi have ideas about how unusual celebrities are but I doubt any are 'in the know'. Keep in mind that many 'paparazzi prizes' are in fact planted. Celebs are often instructed to 'get out and be seen' as well, to keep them in the public consciousness.
Avoiding paparazzi is actually inconvenient and difficult at times. I'm sure there is a love/hate for most.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 31, 2016 21:53:52 GMT
How do celebs really feel about fans? Is it at all mixed? People go positively insane over superstars, screaming and crying as if they were meeting a demigod in the flesh. That used to annoy me when I was younger, because I am kind of insubordinate and it annoyed me when people worship other humans as if they didn't pee and fart like the rest of humanity. Anyway point being - of course celebs love their fans because without fans they don't have fame. But is it a patronizing kind of affection for fans, a put-on or a facade, or is it really genuine? The best analogy would be a favorite food. Eat it everyday and eventually it isn't favored.
The initial stages of celebrity gratefully receives the affections of fans in a genuine way. Take Ari's twitter as an example. Draw back to having less than 1million followers and see how she interacts with them. But now, she posts sporadically (and it's not always her).
This is a naturally occurring 'programming' of sorts. Where the celebrity can maintain the motions of the enthusiasm they once had for their fans, but the authentic desire becomes diluted and potentially completely lost.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 22:57:11 GMT
How do celebs really feel about fans? Is it at all mixed? People go positively insane over superstars, screaming and crying as if they were meeting a demigod in the flesh. That used to annoy me when I was younger, because I am kind of insubordinate and it annoyed me when people worship other humans as if they didn't pee and fart like the rest of humanity. Anyway point being - of course celebs love their fans because without fans they don't have fame. But is it a patronizing kind of affection for fans, a put-on or a facade, or is it really genuine? The best analogy would be a favorite food. Eat it everyday and eventually it isn't favored.
The initial stages of celebrity gratefully receives the affections of fans in a genuine way. Take Ari's twitter as an example. Draw back to having less than 1million followers and see how she interacts with them. But now, she posts sporadically (and it's not always her).
This is a naturally occurring 'programming' of sorts. Where the celebrity can maintain the motions of the enthusiasm they once had for their fans, but the authentic desire becomes diluted and potentially completely lost.
I guess this makes sense, and seems sort of inevitable. A little sad, but, understandable. I was watching a show on Netflix, it's called "Bojack Horseman", it is sort of a funny adult cartoon about hollywood and celebrities. Obviously there are no undertones of mind control. But still it brought a few regular showbizzy type questions. As you mentioned when Ari posts it's not always her. Bojack Horseman portrays celebs as having "social media managers", do you guys trade off doing that kind of thing or is it a dedicated position that somebody holds? What's the difference between an agent and a manager? Is a manager something that only bigger stars have or something? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 23:01:24 GMT
You mentioned earlier on this thread that, if we had happened upon a different illuminati handler, the spiritual dimensions of their work would probably be raised with some mentioning. What exactly is the spiritual outlook of your average illuminati-type individual, whether handler or not - I mean, from what I've looked into, it seems to be vaguely luciferian or something of that nature. The light-bearer being the savior of humanity? Or am I totally off the mark.
I also want to know, just sort of for personally curious reasons, how did you happen upon GLP? How long did you lurk before making that initial thread? Did you look upon those of us who posted their with amusement or genuine interest? Again, just sort of personally curious. Was GLP a hobby for you for awhile, something that you'd do for fun?
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Aug 1, 2016 0:12:52 GMT
About memory. I know memory is fickle in the human mind to begin with. And we talked about trauma a little and the influence trauma has on memory. I believe you said that the subject's reaction to trauma depends on the particularities of the subject. What happens when you want to ensure that something gets remembered, or on the other side of the spectrum, that something gets forgotten? What would you do to ensure that comes to pass, even despite individual differences? Is there specific method for manipulating memory, or does it vary between programmers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Aug 1, 2016 14:08:19 GMT
What tools does your industry use to guard its secrets?
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Aug 1, 2016 14:43:39 GMT
Do you have a colleague you look up to or admire, and/or whom you have learned from, and if so what about them and their methods do you admire ?
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 2, 2016 3:41:44 GMT
The best analogy would be a favorite food. Eat it everyday and eventually it isn't favored.
The initial stages of celebrity gratefully receives the affections of fans in a genuine way. Take Ari's twitter as an example. Draw back to having less than 1million followers and see how she interacts with them. But now, she posts sporadically (and it's not always her).
This is a naturally occurring 'programming' of sorts. Where the celebrity can maintain the motions of the enthusiasm they once had for their fans, but the authentic desire becomes diluted and potentially completely lost.
I guess this makes sense, and seems sort of inevitable. A little sad, but, understandable. I was watching a show on Netflix, it's called "Bojack Horseman", it is sort of a funny adult cartoon about hollywood and celebrities. Obviously there are no undertones of mind control. But still it brought a few regular showbizzy type questions. As you mentioned when Ari posts it's not always her. Bojack Horseman portrays celebs as having "social media managers", do you guys trade off doing that kind of thing or is it a dedicated position that somebody holds? What's the difference between an agent and a manager? Is a manager something that only bigger stars have or something? Anything with 'manager' in it usually works for the talent agency. It's ultimately just another word for "assistant agent', a person who takes care of usually uncritical facets of a client's career. These 'managers' are almost always exclusive to only one or two clients, freeing the agent to work on a broader spectrum of clients.
These uncritical facets can include social media, scheduling, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 2, 2016 3:47:57 GMT
You mentioned earlier on this thread that, if we had happened upon a different illuminati handler, the spiritual dimensions of their work would probably be raised with some mentioning. What exactly is the spiritual outlook of your average illuminati-type individual, whether handler or not - I mean, from what I've looked into, it seems to be vaguely luciferian or something of that nature. The light-bearer being the savior of humanity? Or am I totally off the mark. I also want to know, just sort of for personally curious reasons, how did you happen upon GLP? How long did you lurk before making that initial thread? Did you look upon those of us who posted their with amusement or genuine interest? Again, just sort of personally curious. Was GLP a hobby for you for awhile, something that you'd do for fun? No, it runs the gamut. Most prescribe to religion of the 'hand that feeds them'. I prefer to let my results garner favor. If you're seeking some unifying 'religion' of Illuminati, you won't find one. As I think I've said before, "anything but Christ" is the mantra.
One day many years ago I decided to see what the internet knew about the "Illuminati". GLP is prominent in web positioning.
I don't look down on people - my line of work and upbringing have taught me that no one is ever always wrong just as they are never always right. And though I have a low threshold for inanity, sometimes what we think of as inane one day is the new truth the next.
I lurked there just as I do here. You'll note that I don't really venture outside this post. The same held true for my time at GLP.
|
|
