|
|
Post by WildRose on Jul 18, 2017 2:48:37 GMT
Hi everybody,
Thank you for this discussion, it was an extremely interesting read. Of course, special thanks to Jos for providing insides and sharing lots of detail with us. I have several questions to Jos, if he doesn't mind and has time to answer.
Well, lots of A-listers did seem disturbed or at least not genuine, lacking authenticity to many, at least to people with intuition. But what about regular people? If you look around, especially in big places full of ambition like New York, you will see that so many regular folks are so disconnected from their cores and don't even know who they really are and what their hearts really want. They often themselves create 'mini- alters' so to say, particular personalities to display at work, other places to be what they are 'supposed' to be, to fit in, to achieve smth. If in case with celebrities, there are programmers/handlers with triggers switching between personas, regular people often forget to switch themselves once they find convenient image/ images that 'work' and create desired impressions. They often seldom remember about their real selves, cores and assume those newly created personas completely.
And if you look at those people, you literally see that core of personality, beautiful spirit is covered by layers and layers of fears, stereotypes, opinions seeded by others, social expectations, you name it which (often subconsciously) manufacture those fake personas.
The question to Jos is whether this fake persona can be considered a 'fetus' of an alter, a very mild form of it.
Also I just thought that the best programmer is life itself as it's impeccable at creating perfectly necessary negative/positive situations in our lives to transform us. I strongly believe that everything happens for a reason and there is no such thing as accident at all. And if you don't like smth, the best and the only person to blame is yourself as you attract exactly what you are. Life has to give us bad scenarios and shatter us programming for particular life lessons and understanding because we often do not learn well on positive things. Cold showers from time to time really help. But of course, the ultimate goal is the opposite. In celebrity programming the subjects are detached from their real selves pretty much forever and get alters exchanging the loss of themselves for material things like fame and money. While life shatters us to do the opposite- take away those layers and layers of things on top of the core and unleash our beautiful real selves, authentic and full of unconditional love to everything and everybody, feeling oneness with everything and everybody basically shifting focus from material things to pure divine live. What do you think about it, Jos?
I want to say that everybody on this forum seems to be amazing and insightful. Well, all people are amazing creatures:) but some of them are a bit more so:)
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Jul 31, 2017 6:41:44 GMT
What you describe is known as pre-conditioning. There are many layers of it, so much so that it has become a part of daily life. The ambitious take to it better than most. It is intensified obviously, for those within the industry, but all the self-destructive tools are available to everyone. Certainly these personas can be used to establish an initial alter (the wedge) if they are sufficiently in opposition to the nature of the subject. It isn't a 'real alter' per se', not until it can take full control and deny control to the core persona.
You'll find that at the core of the trans-everything, self-identity agenda is simply what you have already seen - a way to reach the unambitious and encourage them to attach themselves to a divisive, shallow portion of the greater whole (not only of themselves but the community).
Certainly life is a programmer, and whether it is by divine providence or utter randomness, who's to say? The point is moot anyway. MK/Speculum is programming based on the will of another human mind. Whether that is an exact replica of 'life' or the opposite doesn't matter, unless of course the divine should step in to intervene in this process.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montblanc on Aug 1, 2017 4:14:57 GMT
What you describe is known as pre-conditioning. There are many layers of it, so much so that it has become a part of daily life. The ambitious take to it better than most. It is intensified obviously, for those within the industry, but all the self-destructive tools are available to everyone. Certainly these personas can be used to establish an initial alter (the wedge) if they are sufficiently in opposition to the nature of the subject. It isn't a 'real alter' per se', not until it can take full control and deny control to the core persona. You'll find that at the core of the trans-everything, self-identity agenda is simply what you have already seen - a way to reach the unambitious and encourage them to attach themselves to a divisive, shallow portion of the greater whole (not only of themselves but the community). Certainly life is a programmer, and whether it is by divine providence or utter randomness, who's to say? The point is moot anyway. MK/Speculum is programming based on the will of another human mind. Whether that is an exact replica of 'life' or the opposite doesn't matter, unless of course the divine should step in to intervene in this process. Jos, are you aware of mobile games and the micro-transactions system through which games available for mobile devices are distributed freely but contain something called "in-app purchases"? Your last post reminded me, in conjunction with a review I saw on of these games, that most of them are made so that when you reach a certain level, caps on your progress will become visibly higher and harder to surpass, unless you invest a hefty amount peridodically in those app purchases to keep your progress smooth. Whoever thought of this system initially seems to be well versed enough in human psychology to understand that the pre-conditioning that makes most of us competitive, and the gamer's spirit which pushes people to their utmost competitive state in order to be the best at any game they play, would make it so that a lot of people would inevitably spend more on these games than you would normally pay for a copy of a regular videogame, thus making each app have the potential for infinite profit. Your thoughts on this? |
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 1, 2017 6:04:58 GMT
Montblanc, you've 'eyes to see'. Certainly the internet-era has been set upon by the psychology of consuming. Never before have the wolves had such instant and intimate access to the sheep. I'd expect this to only get worse until there's some sort of 'push back'. The problem with the green-eyed monsters of the world is that they always eventually ruin a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montblanc on Aug 1, 2017 8:32:20 GMT
As a player of some such games I am fortunate to have never spent any exorbitant or periodic amount on any of them, but one game I used to play daily, and which I was even part of group on social media dedicated to it, had members that spent as much as $1000 monthly, or more, on it. I understand that we can choose not to be sheep, that such games can be enjoyed without going overboard on spending. If you're a videogame person then traditional games in which you make a one time purchase for the complete experience, and maybe some extra on optional dlc's, is more rational economic-wise.
One thing I noticed was that the highly demanding game currencies have given rise to scam and ruse where "cheat engine" pages that propose a program that is capable of hacking the games' servers and edit your amount of currency can be downloaded. Of course, these are but phishing scams where the page creators set up a survey through which you are to forfeit personal data to download the program, obviously they can't really access those servers and even if such programs exist I imagine their creators would rather sell them than freely distribute them.
So on one side we have the game publishing companies supporting an highly abusive and elaborated ponzi scheme to profit off of their "freemium", as they are called, apps in order to rake unnusual profits from mostly mediocre games. On the other we have people who exploit the will to surpass economic barriers in order to achieve success at a simple game, by creating elaborated trickery to collect personal data from the unfortunatelly naive. And in the latter case it's actually also the work of "legitimate" companies employing aggressive marketing strategies and using highly illegal bait to draw in profit.
What actually angers me is that any government applying pressure at this moment on illegal internet activities will go bounds and leaps to shutdown services that would hurt the profit of copyright activities but seem rather apathetic regarding glaring abuses of consumer rights. If this isn't a great example of how governments care more about the lobbying groups' interests than the general public that elects them, than I don't know what is.
Anyway, you're right the wolves have found a sheep farm all for themselves in the internet and are enjoying their daily meals effortlessly. But I was really curious about wether these systems could have originated from the work of someone on your specific field of work as, you know, extraneous research applications of your work.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 2, 2017 4:31:14 GMT
Behavioral modification, behavioral sciences - they are born not of the goal of helping people (though such a faction does exist), but of profit. The old adage "follow the money" will almost always lead you to any source you seek. Remember that one of the agendas of the 'illuminati' is to have us waste our time. Well in these apps, not only have they found a way to waste our time, but also to keep us enslaved to debt. It isn't by accident. marketing and behavioral sciences have always gone hand in hand. marketing IS a behavioral science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Luna on Aug 5, 2017 13:03:20 GMT
Hi Jos and everyone on this thread, I'm new here!
I read most of the other thread on GLP and I found it very interesting, thank you for your insight Jos. I am a fan of Ariana, she has a remarkable singing voice.
I have a few questions for you Jos:
1. I think you mentioned that the shattering process for Ariana began in 2012, making her around 19 years old at the time. Is speculum only done on adults? Are none of the children on Nickelodeon or Disney subject to this? I ask this because it is widely believed that child stars are subject to programming.
2. Does Ariana realise that she is under mind control? I recall you mentioning that if you were to ask her, she would say that she remembers. She appears to be a very happy person so I must ask, wouldn't any recollection of the trauma lead to serious PSTD/depression on a daily basis?
3. Once you begin shattering a client, what if they say they don't want the lifestyle anymore? What if they think it's no longer worth it and they don't want to go through with the shattering? Can they opt out and live a normal life again, away from fame?
4. You said you couldn't describe the shattering process in too much detail in fear of being banned on GLP, so I was wondering if you could expand on it here? You described aspects of emotional trauma, but what does the physical trauma entail? More specifically, what physical trauma was involved with Ariana's transformation? Is the birthmark on her left shoulder from something? As pointed out in the GLP thread, what is the scar below her clavicle bone from?
5. You mentioned that shattering is a 10 month process, how many sessions of shattering occur during that time period?
6. What is your perspective on cloning? Do you believe that celebrities are cloned? I know you said that your client's obsession with Audrey Hepburn has resulted in various surgical procedures, but she looks vastly different from 2011, almost as if she could be a different person. What are your thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|
Post by WildRose on Aug 8, 2017 3:12:27 GMT
WWell, I think one should distinguish between fake self- identity and real one. There are lots of agendas in this world encouraging fake self- identity to distract people from the real one but it works only for those who don't know themselves.For example, feminism is a fake self- identity agenda while a feminine strong woman in a perfect balance and unity of her opposites is a whole different beast:) I believe, that if you really know yourself, nobody could really influence you but that comes with experience and tons of spiritual work. I also believe in a constructive doubt which is the engine of development but when you really feel and know yourself, you know the limits of this doubt. It's all about feeling what is what and why. And then- achieving the real self- identity and freedom because they come hand in hand. I really love Japanese culture and it's funny that they don't say 'I'm free', they say ' I return to my path of nothingness' instead. How could you reveal it better?  And language is a collective subcobscious, that's why their culture and art are in general so insightful. I would say that life is a programmer by a divine providence as I don't believe in accidents but that's just my life experience. May be, for others it's different. In my life people, situations emerge at the right time and come perfectly designed so to say, even bad events. But you see the pattern when you understand what precisely life tries to show you and what lessons it tries to teach you through other people, situations, etc. Everything and everybody we encounter are tools for our development. And if something exists (including Mk/Spectrum), it's a part of a divine plan and a tool (may be of punishment) that should be there. If it doesn't have to be there, it wouldn't exist. Life is a theater and we all are actors, literally, and this theater is run impeccably well. But while the majority of the 'actors' are non- realizing, it's good to be realizing and conscious. But believing in the divine, I absolutely do not believe in religions, to me they all were created artificially with a purpose. They took a core of truth to attract people, manufactured some prophets and here we go. But that's just an opinion, I don't want to offend anybody with this. And a couple of questions to Jos, if he doesn't mind: 1. What about film directors? Are they also shattered and programmed like everybody else but in a more careful way because they are content creators? 2. What about Europe? Does it happen same way over there? Thank you |
|
|
|
Post by Illuminatrix on Aug 9, 2017 16:51:44 GMT
Andrea, alters must be 'serviced' regularly, but the prime personality (usually the original) does indeed have the lion's share of control. Servicing them usually entails providing whatever their primary function is. This can often be satisfied by simply engaging in a conversation about the alter's subject of choice. Blossom, 'butterfly' is merely an alliteration on my part. I do love language and sometimes it can interfere with clear communications. My apologies for the confusion. As you likely know, the internet is rife with information about butterflies and their role in mind control. It's true, many (including myself) allude to the metamorphosis of the insect to the shattering process. Crystalln, I think it's time that I admit that 'Speculum' is only a bit argot, a cover word for the real process to throw off internet monitoring. I do refer to my work (as do others of similar mindset) as "speculum', meaning ultimately, MK Ultra with modernized, even experimental modalities. Primarily it is the minimal use of pharmaceuticals in the shattering process. Note the word's etymology: mirror or looking-glass, to look. I derive no pleasure from the shattering process (it is a means to an end and quite arduous for all involved), but I am most intrigued by the comparative outcomes, especially when a method produces an anticipated one in multiple subjects. The mind, unlike physical processes, can vary vastly even in two subjects who've lived analogous lives. It's quite fascinating. A speculum is a tool for forced dilation of a woman's nether area in order to insert a foreign object. MK Ultra is essentially forced dilation of the mind in order to insert foreign programs - like viruses running in your BIOS. It is aptly nicknamed "Speculum." I had a dream recently about urban gang members who thought it was cool to allow their skulls to be cut open and their brains removed in bits by groups of their peers. Whoever could withstand it was deemed to be "tough." No one withstood it. They all became drooling zombies yet they continued to live. In the same dream I met the scientist and teacher whose research led the way in the utilization of sound and frequency to alter group thinking. He was much beloved by the people. These seem to be metaphors of what we actually experience in our world today. Our world seems quite upside down. On other subjects: Jos, do you know what is happening with Justin Bieber and the odd news about his cult leanings? It seems rather NAMBLA-ish. I ask because I understand that he shares a manager with your client. And another odd question. I've read that you used to be involved with sports stars. Why are they now being called "GOAT"s? I understand that it means "Greatest of All Time" but there's a very creepy video called "I PET GOAT" about the end times with a goat shown in a crate. I'm assuming this means that the PTB are bragging that humanity's best athletes are little but pets in their eyes. Likewise there is the scapegoat and the fraternity goat meaning (yuck). Is that really what they are communicating? Thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by Illuminatrix on Aug 14, 2017 20:41:37 GMT
Interesting - Game of Thrones also uses GOT symbology. Wow, GOAT must be the hottest new thing. Perhaps we shall see GOAT name brands and T-Shirts coming soon. They are only slightly better than OBEY. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 22, 2017 4:20:43 GMT
Hi Jos and everyone on this thread, I'm new here! I read most of the other thread on GLP and I found it very interesting, thank you for your insight Jos. I am a fan of Ariana, she has a remarkable singing voice. I have a few questions for you Jos: 1. I think you mentioned that the shattering process for Ariana began in 2012, making her around 19 years old at the time. Is speculum only done on adults? Are none of the children on Nickelodeon or Disney subject to this? I ask this because it is widely believed that child stars are subject to programming. 2. Does Ariana realise that she is under mind control? I recall you mentioning that if you were to ask her, she would say that she remembers. She appears to be a very happy person so I must ask, wouldn't any recollection of the trauma lead to serious PSTD/depression on a daily basis? 3. Once you begin shattering a client, what if they say they don't want the lifestyle anymore? What if they think it's no longer worth it and they don't want to go through with the shattering? Can they opt out and live a normal life again, away from fame? 4. You said you couldn't describe the shattering process in too much detail in fear of being banned on GLP, so I was wondering if you could expand on it here? You described aspects of emotional trauma, but what does the physical trauma entail? More specifically, what physical trauma was involved with Ariana's transformation? Is the birthmark on her left shoulder from something? As pointed out in the GLP thread, what is the scar below her clavicle bone from? 5. You mentioned that shattering is a 10 month process, how many sessions of shattering occur during that time period? 6. What is your perspective on cloning? Do you believe that celebrities are cloned? I know you said that your client's obsession with Audrey Hepburn has resulted in various surgical procedures, but she looks vastly different from 2011, almost as if she could be a different person. What are your thoughts on this? Hello Luna, Welcome.
1) No, shattering is reserved for a mature mind. Kids receive pre-conditioning. 2) Yes, she is fully aware. She has however, come to embrace a programmer's advice for any asset: live in the moment 3) Client's aren't shattered by choice. 4) I don't go into details for myriad reasons: they are unsavory, more they describe actions that could be construed incorrectly. If you'd like to fully explore the physical tolls of the shattering, you have but to acquire a book on modern interrogation techniques. The birthmark is a birthmark. the scar is... something else. 5) Initially roughly 3-5 weeks of constant work. Then periods of 'peace' broken by 'events'. There are approximately 3-5 'events'. Programming requires long periods of time believing it's 'over'. 6) No, I don't believe that there's any cloning going on. Here are the secrets to AG's transformation from 2010 to today: Surgery - Lips, Brow, Bridge of Nose, weight-loss, dental surgery, and finally regular spray tan.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 22, 2017 4:24:42 GMT
WWell, I think one should distinguish between fake self- identity and real one. There are lots of agendas in this world encouraging fake self- identity to distract people from the real one but it works only for those who don't know themselves.For example, feminism is a fake self- identity agenda while a feminine strong woman in a perfect balance and unity of her opposites is a whole different beast:) I believe, that if you really know yourself, nobody could really influence you but that comes with experience and tons of spiritual work. I also believe in a constructive doubt which is the engine of development but when you really feel and know yourself, you know the limits of this doubt. It's all about feeling what is what and why. And then- achieving the real self- identity and freedom because they come hand in hand. I really love Japanese culture and it's funny that they don't say 'I'm free', they say ' I return to my path of nothingness' instead. How could you reveal it better? And language is a collective subcobscious, that's why their culture and art are in general so insightful. I would say that life is a programmer by a divine providence as I don't believe in accidents but that's just my life experience. May be, for others it's different. In my life people, situations emerge at the right time and come perfectly designed so to say, even bad events. But you see the pattern when you understand what precisely life tries to show you and what lessons it tries to teach you through other people, situations, etc. Everything and everybody we encounter are tools for our development. And if something exists (including Mk/Spectrum), it's a part of a divine plan and a tool (may be of punishment) that should be there. If it doesn't have to be there, it wouldn't exist. Life is a theater and we all are actors, literally, and this theater is run impeccably well. But while the majority of the 'actors' are non- realizing, it's good to be realizing and conscious. But believing in the divine, I absolutely do not believe in religions, to me they all were created artificially with a purpose. They took a core of truth to attract people, manufactured some prophets and here we go. But that's just an opinion, I don't want to offend anybody with this. And a couple of questions to Jos, if he doesn't mind: 1. What about film directors? Are they also shattered and programmed like everybody else but in a more careful way because they are content creators? 2. What about Europe? Does it happen same way over there? Thank you Very insightful. 1) Directors are rarely shattered. many of them are 'handlers', in the sense that they usually have the keys to the assets mind. 2) Yes, western culture works almost identically no matter where it is. Differences arise when palpable differences in culture, values, and upbringing occur.
|
|
|
|
Post by josv2 on Aug 22, 2017 4:31:50 GMT
Andrea, alters must be 'serviced' regularly, but the prime personality (usually the original) does indeed have the lion's share of control. Servicing them usually entails providing whatever their primary function is. This can often be satisfied by simply engaging in a conversation about the alter's subject of choice. Blossom, 'butterfly' is merely an alliteration on my part. I do love language and sometimes it can interfere with clear communications. My apologies for the confusion. As you likely know, the internet is rife with information about butterflies and their role in mind control. It's true, many (including myself) allude to the metamorphosis of the insect to the shattering process. Crystalln, I think it's time that I admit that 'Speculum' is only a bit argot, a cover word for the real process to throw off internet monitoring. I do refer to my work (as do others of similar mindset) as "speculum', meaning ultimately, MK Ultra with modernized, even experimental modalities. Primarily it is the minimal use of pharmaceuticals in the shattering process. Note the word's etymology: mirror or looking-glass, to look. I derive no pleasure from the shattering process (it is a means to an end and quite arduous for all involved), but I am most intrigued by the comparative outcomes, especially when a method produces an anticipated one in multiple subjects. The mind, unlike physical processes, can vary vastly even in two subjects who've lived analogous lives. It's quite fascinating. A speculum is a tool for forced dilation of a woman's nether area in order to insert a foreign object. MK Ultra is essentially forced dilation of the mind in order to insert foreign programs - like viruses running in your BIOS. It is aptly nicknamed "Speculum." I had a dream recently about urban gang members who thought it was cool to allow their skulls to be cut open and their brains removed in bits by groups of their peers. Whoever could withstand it was deemed to be "tough." No one withstood it. They all became drooling zombies yet they continued to live. In the same dream I met the scientist and teacher whose research led the way in the utilization of sound and frequency to alter group thinking. He was much beloved by the people. These seem to be metaphors of what we actually experience in our world today. Our world seems quite upside down. On other subjects: Jos, do you know what is happening with Justin Bieber and the odd news about his cult leanings? It seems rather NAMBLA-ish. I ask because I understand that he shares a manager with your client. And another odd question. I've read that you used to be involved with sports stars. Why are they now being called "GOAT"s? I understand that it means "Greatest of All Time" but there's a very creepy video called "I PET GOAT" about the end times with a goat shown in a crate. I'm assuming this means that the PTB are bragging that humanity's best athletes are little but pets in their eyes. Likewise there is the scapegoat and the fraternity goat meaning (yuck). Is that really what they are communicating? Thank you. Hi. I wouldn't completely discount reports from JB. Where there's smoke... but remember this: he's an asset. Anyone who 'asked him' to do this, didn't have control of him. There exists in Hollywood, a ring of powerful men and women who partake in such things. They aren't 'the Illuminati'. Rather, they're a gathering of wish-to-be's with a modicum of power, enough so to sometimes force others into actions as were allegedly described by JB. These people might be 'up the pyramid' as it were, but they are nowhere near the top.
Interesting. Yes I'm familiar with the acronym. To many it means, "god of all things". I don't believe that the term is derived from atop the pyramid, however this isn't my area. They do like to inject words into the collective. You may be onto something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Aug 22, 2017 17:31:29 GMT
Jos, I recently did something called neurofeedback. I think I did the Alpha/Theta, the eyes open one to help with relaxation, and supposedly to help increase openness and receptivity or some junk like that. Know anything about this? Useful for you? Useful to me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Illuminatrix on Aug 23, 2017 0:50:12 GMT
Hi back. Thank you for responding. You have written that you study the Book of Enoch and that you appreciate ancient history - so who i s Arstikapha to you? Anyone? Noone? You have brought him up before. And the world was so focused on Azazel, the show-off. So perhaps we have been misled.
Do you even care about any of this, oh Book of Enoch scholar - or is it all to be relegated into the realm of woo?
|
|
|
|
Post by Illuminatrix on Aug 23, 2017 4:03:41 GMT
Ha be careful with your response. Arrogance has always been the downfall of the greatest beings. You are a great being Jos, not just a sheep. Humility sucks but it is the savior.  |
|
|
|
Post by Luna on Aug 25, 2017 8:44:22 GMT
Hi Jos and everyone on this thread, I'm new here! I read most of the other thread on GLP and I found it very interesting, thank you for your insight Jos. I am a fan of Ariana, she has a remarkable singing voice. I have a few questions for you Jos: 1. I think you mentioned that the shattering process for Ariana began in 2012, making her around 19 years old at the time. Is speculum only done on adults? Are none of the children on Nickelodeon or Disney subject to this? I ask this because it is widely believed that child stars are subject to programming. 2. Does Ariana realise that she is under mind control? I recall you mentioning that if you were to ask her, she would say that she remembers. She appears to be a very happy person so I must ask, wouldn't any recollection of the trauma lead to serious PSTD/depression on a daily basis? 3. Once you begin shattering a client, what if they say they don't want the lifestyle anymore? What if they think it's no longer worth it and they don't want to go through with the shattering? Can they opt out and live a normal life again, away from fame? 4. You said you couldn't describe the shattering process in too much detail in fear of being banned on GLP, so I was wondering if you could expand on it here? You described aspects of emotional trauma, but what does the physical trauma entail? More specifically, what physical trauma was involved with Ariana's transformation? Is the birthmark on her left shoulder from something? As pointed out in the GLP thread, what is the scar below her clavicle bone from? 5. You mentioned that shattering is a 10 month process, how many sessions of shattering occur during that time period? 6. What is your perspective on cloning? Do you believe that celebrities are cloned? I know you said that your client's obsession with Audrey Hepburn has resulted in various surgical procedures, but she looks vastly different from 2011, almost as if she could be a different person. What are your thoughts on this? Hello Luna, Welcome.
1) No, shattering is reserved for a mature mind. Kids receive pre-conditioning. 2) Yes, she is fully aware. She has however, come to embrace a programmer's advice for any asset: live in the moment 3) Client's aren't shattered by choice. 4) I don't go into details for myriad reasons: they are unsavory, more they describe actions that could be construed incorrectly. If you'd like to fully explore the physical tolls of the shattering, you have but to acquire a book on modern interrogation techniques. The birthmark is a birthmark. the scar is... something else. 5) Initially roughly 3-5 weeks of constant work. Then periods of 'peace' broken by 'events'. There are approximately 3-5 'events'. Programming requires long periods of time believing it's 'over'. 6) No, I don't believe that there's any cloning going on. Here are the secrets to AG's transformation from 2010 to today: Surgery - Lips, Brow, Bridge of Nose, weight-loss, dental surgery, and finally regular spray tan.
Very interesting. Thanks for replying Jos. I have a few more questions if you don't mind: 1) 3 - 5 weeks of constant work is intense... How did that fit into Ari's busy schedule? I presume you took her somewhere to perform the shattering, so did her friends and family ever wonder where she was all of those times? 2) Considering that Ari was constantly in the spotlight throughout 2012, how did you perform physical trauma without leaving permanent scarring, or at least scars that are obvious? I don't think I've ever seen Ari with terrible injuries all over her body and to be completely honest, I really can't see the scar on her chest that was mentioned in GLP. 3) I apologise if this comes across as insensitive, but was the Manchester attack one of those "3 - 5 events"? I noticed she sung 'Somewhere Over the Rainbow' at the end of the One Love concert and I couldn't help but question the link between that song and the Wizard of Oz programming. Thanks for taking time to answer our questions. |
|
|
|
Post by Luna on Aug 25, 2017 9:16:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildrose on Sept 3, 2017 20:26:35 GMT
Thank you for information, Jos. I have a couple of other questions:
1. What do you think about Rosenhan experiment?
2. What's your opinion on our life/realm/earth, the purpose of it? Do you think it's a prison, development school, creative playground, smth else? What do your "Illuminati" acquaintances who are into 'woo- woo' think about this matter?
Thank you for your time
|
|
|
|
Post by WildRose on Sept 3, 2017 21:25:44 GMT
I asked you about the Rosenhan experiment which illustrated some of the industry problems but what do you think about the industry in general? Do you think that psychiatrists these days really help people and qualify to do it on a high professional level? A female friend of mine has insomnia issues and I clearly feel a strong anxiety in her like smth really clenches her inside preventing her from truly opening up to the world. Of course, it's just a surface of bigger issues which are hidden and trigger those conditions. I know that she had a bad relationship with her father and other childhood problems so there are lots of things to dig into to help her. Although she is 'I'm strong, I'm fine' type of a person, she would explore that with a good professional but out of 5 physciatrists she saw, only 1 attempted any kind of therapy, others just prescribed her pills. To me it's frustrating, I am still idealistic:) I think that if you venture to become a psychiatrist, you must have a genuine desire to help people and do what it takes for it. Some of them are really disturbed themselves, by the way. I personally know one children psychiatrist who has violent hysteric outbreaks for no reason, he clearly needs help himself:) It's funny and sad at the same time. Another acquaintance of mine- a psychiatrist- told me I am his potential client because I love Dostoevsky and everybody who loves this writer has a problem. Then he added that he loved Dostoevsky too:)
It's just I was considering to become a psychiatrist myself some time ago and tried to look into the industry but, honestly, it does not look that good to me. Studying for about 10 years to hand out pills and do superficial therapy is not a pathway to help people. Plus, I don't believe in guidelines of this particular medical profession. A good psychiatrist should feel his client real deep on all the levels and then address his problems, and each person is a different story. How can it fit into any guidelines? Even if 2 cases seem similar, they are not identitical and should be addressed differently. Guidelines make it simplistic, ideally, therapy should be perfectly custom tailored.
Are clinical psychologists any better?
Oh God, it was a long blog post:) It will be very interesting to hear your opinion.
|
|
And language is a collective subcobscious, that's why their culture and art are in general so insightful. 
