Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 20:09:19 GMT
John: “Proportional Adaption Law Theory? What is that?”
Pal: “The proportional adaption law theory is about proposing the possibility or hypothesis that there is a universal and natural law called, ‘proportional adaption’ which that governs rest of physic and even biological laws or pretty much entirely of existential laws. And could lead to abundance of safe and clean source of energy for everyone on this Earth planet.”
John: “Really? The mathematics behind physics, biology, and among other fields part of life existence are far too over-complicated to be governed by a singularly law.”
Pal: “Then how do all of mathematics behind all said fields work out together in this universe we live in?”
John: “What do you mean by that?”
Pal: “Look at that clouds over there.. look at the motion movements of trees’ foliage of leafs from wind.. and look at the Sun. Everything within our perception of the universe seem to work out. Seems the complex of mathematics work out together somehow, don’t you think so?”
John: “Ok, tell me a bit about the law.”
Pal: “Okay, for anything to be part of the universe it is considered to be a proportion of whole.”
John: “Proportion of whole universe? How come?”
Pal: “Look at this grassy ground underneath us. It can’t exist without dirt soil, water, and among other things. It needs these other things, and each of these need other things and so on. Proportional relationship to whole of other things. Do you now understand the proportion part?”
John: “Yeah, I think so.”
Pal: “Alright, now on to the adaption part.. you know what the word means, right?”
John: “The act of fitting in.”
Pal: “Yes, you see how things are adapted to life conditions – sometimes some can and not depending on circumstantial situations. Adapted as being fitted in this universe.”
John: “A thing being proportional adapted to life existence in universe. Is this what proportional adaption law means?”
Pal: “Yes and more. Here is a general definition of how the law work: Determining between anything and other / another anything or more toward adaptive equilibrium.”
John: “Adaptive equilibrium?”
Pal: “The state of things being fitted in a balanced and or coherent manner. The terminology and concept uses of the equilibrium parting of the proportional adaption law theory are a bit different. For example, there exist different types of equilibrium. A few to name; developed, created, manifested, natural death, etc – these are types of equilibrium. From microscopic to macroscopic level; a thing that is being as proportion or part in relation to whole of universe, it and whole together must interact with each other (proportional relationship) in order to determine toward adaptive equilibrium to exist as these are.”
John: “Ok. I kinda get it, but how does the determining factor in-between anything and other / another anything or more ‘decide’ or ‘force’ to perform specific action(s) to make both or more of these anything toward adaptive equilibrium?”
Pal: “It all depends on the overall threshold level of proportional adaption law. You see, we and things are it. Previously I said there is it, but I don’t mean it as being separated entity that governs us and things, rather it is things themselves and us that summarily makes up the proportional adaption law, ultimately the very fabric of space-time continuum.”
John: “Why?”
Pal: “That is the important and key question. The law is the only one as being ‘Goldilocks zone’ of which life existence or universe can existenize to exist (or co-exist) as it as, because of its inclusion of or incorporating synthesis of two different types of determining factor known as determinism (“mechanism”) and in-determinism (“freewill”) into coherent one, working things out in general. If you disagree with this, let’s examine other two separated possibilities as being examples in pure sense; determinism and in-determinism. You ready?”
John: “Sure.”
Pal: “Basically speaking.. In the Determinism Universe - No freewill, all of things in universe are determining mechanism in pure sense. The notion is that entirely of universe is robotic. It will run out of its course once its used up and undergo de-coherence. Now as for In-determinism Universe – it contains absolute freewill based decisions and actions of everything, it would be chaos, and it would undergo de-coherence immediately the first moment it is “manifested” sort of.
John: “But the law with its definition as you stated has the determining part. That means it is deterministic one at that. Huh?”
Pal: “Yes. Remember what I said about the overall threshold level of law? Well, that is anything as being in-deterministic thing. And the adaptive equilibrium is yielded result of both determining and in-determining factor.”
“Determining between anything and other / another anything or more toward adaptive equilibrium.”
“red = deterministic force”
“blue = in-deterministic things as threshold level to being forced / decided to change by the red deterministic force.”
“orange = synthesis result of both determining and in-determining, fitted into a coherent form.”
John: “I see. Tell me a bit about the adaptive equilibrium as being coherent process.”
Pal: “In chemistry and physics, atoms generally don’t get destroyed – only undergo change of matter states. The overall threshold level of anything, when is crossed over or less it must undergo change toward adaptive equilibrium. Once it is at an adaptive equilibrium, it is coherent.”
John: “What about the natural death mentioned as one of types of equilibrium, how is that coherence?”
Pal: “It is. The natural death of anything and including sentient living beings (eg human beings, animals, etc) are theoretically parts of change process as per the law theory. Well, the law theory only describe and explain the how-it-work and why in the now in this universe, not before or after universe... I leave that up to you or anybody for philosophical implications.”
John: “But we are still learning, growing to adulthood then old age - that means we aren’t fully at adaptive equilibrium yet? And universe is still expanding and etc?”
Pal: “Technically you are right about that. We and universe are still in perpetual motion till some of us and things get worn out – but at same time, new things and sentient beings are born everyday and the eternity or infinity of universe continues. Perpetual motion wouldn’t have been possible without the proportional adaption law.”
John: “How and why perpetual motion is linked with the proportional adaption law?”
Pal: “As things and we make any motion movement of sort (proportional relationship and interactions) in this universe, that ‘creates’ motion energy of sort. Ripple effect just like waves on water or swirls within water. Or think of domino effect. Now think of planet’s own innermost core’s activity (eg geothermal energy), people’s motion movements, animals, insects, weather, Sun activity, and other elements in outer space of this universe... where do you think about 75% (assuming that 25% is being used by things and people themselves) of all types of energy go to?”
John: “The distribution of energies and change of states... to the environments, most likely.”
Pal: “To and from as well. Plenty of different types of energy from the environments from the Sun and innermost core of the planet, and surroundings. All of this makes universe to be in perpetual motion largely thanks to the proportional adaption law.”
John: “Give me a simple analogy if you can.”
Pal: “Sure. Imagine bathtub filled with water and a small bar of soap. You move the soap around in the water, it creates ripple of waves. Now imagine bathtub along with water as being universe, and soap as .. you. Also the ripple of waves as perpetual motion of energy(ies) everywhere. Get it?”
John: “Gotcha. Thank you for your time explaining the proportional adaption law theory to me.”
Pal: “You’re welcome. Have a fantastic day!”
[Disclaimer: The conversation between characters (John and Pal) never took place and thus is not real, and is used for entertainment reading purpose. However, the context is based on my actual theory.]
Pal: “The proportional adaption law theory is about proposing the possibility or hypothesis that there is a universal and natural law called, ‘proportional adaption’ which that governs rest of physic and even biological laws or pretty much entirely of existential laws. And could lead to abundance of safe and clean source of energy for everyone on this Earth planet.”
John: “Really? The mathematics behind physics, biology, and among other fields part of life existence are far too over-complicated to be governed by a singularly law.”
Pal: “Then how do all of mathematics behind all said fields work out together in this universe we live in?”
John: “What do you mean by that?”
Pal: “Look at that clouds over there.. look at the motion movements of trees’ foliage of leafs from wind.. and look at the Sun. Everything within our perception of the universe seem to work out. Seems the complex of mathematics work out together somehow, don’t you think so?”
John: “Ok, tell me a bit about the law.”
Pal: “Okay, for anything to be part of the universe it is considered to be a proportion of whole.”
John: “Proportion of whole universe? How come?”
Pal: “Look at this grassy ground underneath us. It can’t exist without dirt soil, water, and among other things. It needs these other things, and each of these need other things and so on. Proportional relationship to whole of other things. Do you now understand the proportion part?”
John: “Yeah, I think so.”
Pal: “Alright, now on to the adaption part.. you know what the word means, right?”
John: “The act of fitting in.”
Pal: “Yes, you see how things are adapted to life conditions – sometimes some can and not depending on circumstantial situations. Adapted as being fitted in this universe.”
John: “A thing being proportional adapted to life existence in universe. Is this what proportional adaption law means?”
Pal: “Yes and more. Here is a general definition of how the law work: Determining between anything and other / another anything or more toward adaptive equilibrium.”
John: “Adaptive equilibrium?”
Pal: “The state of things being fitted in a balanced and or coherent manner. The terminology and concept uses of the equilibrium parting of the proportional adaption law theory are a bit different. For example, there exist different types of equilibrium. A few to name; developed, created, manifested, natural death, etc – these are types of equilibrium. From microscopic to macroscopic level; a thing that is being as proportion or part in relation to whole of universe, it and whole together must interact with each other (proportional relationship) in order to determine toward adaptive equilibrium to exist as these are.”
John: “Ok. I kinda get it, but how does the determining factor in-between anything and other / another anything or more ‘decide’ or ‘force’ to perform specific action(s) to make both or more of these anything toward adaptive equilibrium?”
Pal: “It all depends on the overall threshold level of proportional adaption law. You see, we and things are it. Previously I said there is it, but I don’t mean it as being separated entity that governs us and things, rather it is things themselves and us that summarily makes up the proportional adaption law, ultimately the very fabric of space-time continuum.”
John: “Why?”
Pal: “That is the important and key question. The law is the only one as being ‘Goldilocks zone’ of which life existence or universe can existenize to exist (or co-exist) as it as, because of its inclusion of or incorporating synthesis of two different types of determining factor known as determinism (“mechanism”) and in-determinism (“freewill”) into coherent one, working things out in general. If you disagree with this, let’s examine other two separated possibilities as being examples in pure sense; determinism and in-determinism. You ready?”
John: “Sure.”
Pal: “Basically speaking.. In the Determinism Universe - No freewill, all of things in universe are determining mechanism in pure sense. The notion is that entirely of universe is robotic. It will run out of its course once its used up and undergo de-coherence. Now as for In-determinism Universe – it contains absolute freewill based decisions and actions of everything, it would be chaos, and it would undergo de-coherence immediately the first moment it is “manifested” sort of.
John: “But the law with its definition as you stated has the determining part. That means it is deterministic one at that. Huh?”
Pal: “Yes. Remember what I said about the overall threshold level of law? Well, that is anything as being in-deterministic thing. And the adaptive equilibrium is yielded result of both determining and in-determining factor.”
“Determining between anything and other / another anything or more toward adaptive equilibrium.”
“red = deterministic force”
“blue = in-deterministic things as threshold level to being forced / decided to change by the red deterministic force.”
“orange = synthesis result of both determining and in-determining, fitted into a coherent form.”
John: “I see. Tell me a bit about the adaptive equilibrium as being coherent process.”
Pal: “In chemistry and physics, atoms generally don’t get destroyed – only undergo change of matter states. The overall threshold level of anything, when is crossed over or less it must undergo change toward adaptive equilibrium. Once it is at an adaptive equilibrium, it is coherent.”
John: “What about the natural death mentioned as one of types of equilibrium, how is that coherence?”
Pal: “It is. The natural death of anything and including sentient living beings (eg human beings, animals, etc) are theoretically parts of change process as per the law theory. Well, the law theory only describe and explain the how-it-work and why in the now in this universe, not before or after universe... I leave that up to you or anybody for philosophical implications.”
John: “But we are still learning, growing to adulthood then old age - that means we aren’t fully at adaptive equilibrium yet? And universe is still expanding and etc?”
Pal: “Technically you are right about that. We and universe are still in perpetual motion till some of us and things get worn out – but at same time, new things and sentient beings are born everyday and the eternity or infinity of universe continues. Perpetual motion wouldn’t have been possible without the proportional adaption law.”
John: “How and why perpetual motion is linked with the proportional adaption law?”
Pal: “As things and we make any motion movement of sort (proportional relationship and interactions) in this universe, that ‘creates’ motion energy of sort. Ripple effect just like waves on water or swirls within water. Or think of domino effect. Now think of planet’s own innermost core’s activity (eg geothermal energy), people’s motion movements, animals, insects, weather, Sun activity, and other elements in outer space of this universe... where do you think about 75% (assuming that 25% is being used by things and people themselves) of all types of energy go to?”
John: “The distribution of energies and change of states... to the environments, most likely.”
Pal: “To and from as well. Plenty of different types of energy from the environments from the Sun and innermost core of the planet, and surroundings. All of this makes universe to be in perpetual motion largely thanks to the proportional adaption law.”
John: “Give me a simple analogy if you can.”
Pal: “Sure. Imagine bathtub filled with water and a small bar of soap. You move the soap around in the water, it creates ripple of waves. Now imagine bathtub along with water as being universe, and soap as .. you. Also the ripple of waves as perpetual motion of energy(ies) everywhere. Get it?”
John: “Gotcha. Thank you for your time explaining the proportional adaption law theory to me.”
Pal: “You’re welcome. Have a fantastic day!”
[Disclaimer: The conversation between characters (John and Pal) never took place and thus is not real, and is used for entertainment reading purpose. However, the context is based on my actual theory.]
- well, okay.
