Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 11:39:43 GMT
I believe that it's time to openly share these concepts that I've had a deep understanding of. Especially with a recent thread about god, religion, money -- basically what I interpret to be the whole shebang and mess of a matrix society, one that is not sane at all and must be transcended in order to attain the sanity. That's what I think.
This thread is titled service to others through service to self. You can basically interpret these two phrases to be like ways of being. They are each one thing in their own right. For example, X and Y.
I have a prime example in mind. The man named Osho who lived a fantastic life and died in 1990. They (his followers) called him a Godman. One who had become "enlightened" to the max (this was and pretty much still is the terminology for such a state, which is hard to fathom because we should have grown from that point). In the east they called it enlightenment. And this man was the contemporary example - a contemporary mystic. And clearly it carried over as he had an empire built around him.
STO through STS is what you get when you live your life naturally. You can serve others VIA serving yourself. Like, exactly what I'm doing right now. It's basically sharing. But, you have to be selfish in order to create. It's a GOOD selfishness. Not the definition of selfishness that you were perhaps taught, which is bad.
So, I explained all that thus far. Now let's return to the topic of sanity.
There is a great deal of insanity in the human society as we know it now. If not its systems, in its minds for sure. I have firsthand experience of being the only one who is totally sane in what is blatantly insanity (of the mind, or expression of consciousness).
Next we have an abstract thought of sanity at large. This is what I leave you with. At what point, where exactly did any human being (YOU included) become separate from life? Your life is not separate from you. If you can answer that, then you have the capacity to fix it. Lennon did not have a better philosophy of life than anyone else. He gave it away to make it grow. Like I'm doing.
Your definition of sanity will matter. (thought I should put this here)
This thread is titled service to others through service to self. You can basically interpret these two phrases to be like ways of being. They are each one thing in their own right. For example, X and Y.
I have a prime example in mind. The man named Osho who lived a fantastic life and died in 1990. They (his followers) called him a Godman. One who had become "enlightened" to the max (this was and pretty much still is the terminology for such a state, which is hard to fathom because we should have grown from that point). In the east they called it enlightenment. And this man was the contemporary example - a contemporary mystic. And clearly it carried over as he had an empire built around him.
STO through STS is what you get when you live your life naturally. You can serve others VIA serving yourself. Like, exactly what I'm doing right now. It's basically sharing. But, you have to be selfish in order to create. It's a GOOD selfishness. Not the definition of selfishness that you were perhaps taught, which is bad.
So, I explained all that thus far. Now let's return to the topic of sanity.
There is a great deal of insanity in the human society as we know it now. If not its systems, in its minds for sure. I have firsthand experience of being the only one who is totally sane in what is blatantly insanity (of the mind, or expression of consciousness).
Next we have an abstract thought of sanity at large. This is what I leave you with. At what point, where exactly did any human being (YOU included) become separate from life? Your life is not separate from you. If you can answer that, then you have the capacity to fix it. Lennon did not have a better philosophy of life than anyone else. He gave it away to make it grow. Like I'm doing.
Your definition of sanity will matter. (thought I should put this here)