|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jun 13, 2018 1:21:52 GMT
In the literature I'm purveying right now, a time in history is chronicled when ESP research was taken seriously. You may expect that ESP phenomena would not have shown up as legit on most studies, since of course we do not generally accept it as true on the larger social scheme. But there was a lot of evidence that ESP phenomena does take place. The problem is that it is extremely hard to retest and replicate. Of course this seems highly appropriate given the nature of how psychic abilities function in general. Of course, the argument in favor of the paranormal researcher would be that 'he doesn't need to prove ALL CROWS ARE NOT black' to prove the existence of a white crow. All he needs is one white crow. Maybe two. So the SRI is involved with DARPA, AI, internet security, procedural reasoning, fuzzy logic, computer security, and bioinformatics. But that is not their only specialty. The SRI has many appendages, and several decades ago they invested significant resources in a paranormal research agenda. The CIA's reading room has a memorandum here regarding SRI's work with ESP and human-mediated paranormal phenomena. www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00787R000700090012-5.pdfThe document states in no ambiguous terms, this report establishes overwhelming scientific evidence for the existence of human perceptual capacities which are as of yet unexplained.Which is pretty much the opposite of what you might expect, given how notions of ESP are received in polite society today. They do go on to say pretty much in the next sentence: "we just can't figure out how this stuff works or how to make it more actionable for national security objectives. That being said, we still do see uses for it in the domain of intelligence applications." Well then. Very interesting! |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jun 13, 2018 1:58:30 GMT
well the story gets better. supposedly those paranormal research projects made SRI wonder if they could facilitate bio-cybernetic machine/man interfacing. Here is a document I cite as a first-hand source: archive.org/stream/DTIC_ADA048258/DTIC_ADA048258_djvu.txtSo they are looking to use machines to decrypt thought itself, as they state rather plainly. Their benefit is while humans would have trouble correlating the neurological information they gather with patterns in, say, the EEG, they describe how they can rely on programs to make far more nuanced correlations than would be possible by humans alone. The rumor on the conspiracy market generally supposes that this was done quite awhile ago and is old news. The document I provided here is technical and represents scientists reporting on how their results pertain to different systems of thought specifically in language - as the machine is attempting to guess successfully whether the subject is literally thinking in terms of words or thinking more loosely or "covertly" in concepts that may translate out to words but are not explicitly words. It's not easy to find information about "bioinformatics" and even harder to understand if you do find it. Note the following article: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3602157/What is being described is that when the EEG's power was increased along a certain wavelength/frequency, the activity/connection between certain regions in the brain were influenced. specifically here, they had stumbled upon a band that seemed to have an influence of whether the brain was aroused or sleepy - so the scientists in the article are making an effort to better delineate this relationship between the EEG activity and the state of wakefulness in the brain, hopefully in an effort to more directly affect it I would suppose. Note that the ability to determine whether the brain is a sleepy or wakeful state is not exactly splitting neurobehavioral hairs. It's quite a big button, if it is indeed a button. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jun 13, 2018 2:34:19 GMT
Excuse me if I bring this train full circle. Here is an article from the CIA's reading room regarding the application of telepathy to the ends of behavioral modification (note that behavioral modification is a euphamism for mind control - it literally means shaping or determining what somebody decides to do). The pdf is not cryptic either. www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00792R000600320004-3.pdfNow I want y'all to think carefully about whether certain websites tend to conjure up emotions, as this is important. The study found that subjects were suggestible neurologically to the negative emotions and "nasty" thoughts of telepathic "senders"! similar to my last post, areas of the brain affecting wakefulness/restfulness were acted upon. According to the researchers, this was still considered a form of "telepathic hypnotic induction" of sorts, but for something so crude it was quite interesting that it managed to act upon subject's consciousnesses. There is a note in the article that the soviets conducting these experiments believed that whatever brainwaves are involved could be amplified through some kind of signals intelligence. As I noted we now have more complex bio-cybernetic systems and if you go online you can buy yourself an eeg headset. The researchers conclude that "obviously control of human consciousness is of utmost importance". Now, I'm not attempting to overstate anything, however, I have to wonder who is doing similar experiments today. If people were suggestible to posthypnotic scripts through telepathy, is it possible that we are vulnerable to people with bad intentions and their own EEG headset? It sounds a bit strange...but I bet you that it would deliver results. waves.lima-city.de/dok/Accessing%20Every%20Human%20Brain%20-%20M.%20Persinger.pdfto put it differently, we already know that the electromagnetic field has a biological affect on an organism. If we wanted to, we could produce some sort of consistent electromagnetic field which all brains in the aggregate of our species would be included within. Because the disruption produced by the field would always be constant, it is unlikely that people would be able to determine that something was amiss. But the process of cognition would be altered drastically by the field based on a speculative "algorithm", even though once couched in the ubiquitous output of geothermal systems it would be very difficult to isolate. if it were easier to understand neuroscience, perhaps the question of biocybernetics would be less obscure and it would be more obvious that we have a lot of information about neuroscience in general and intelligence communities have spent extra special money and time investigating how electronic or technologic apparatus could produce behavior modification either collectively or individually. To know as much as has been officially declassified, and to say that our intelligence community is not highly interested in understanding it, seems to be assuming that the intelligence community would be smart enough to see the relevance of mind control but too stupid to see the importance of machine-facilitated mind control. And then to those who would say a machine could not possibly produce altered behavioral states or altered consciousness states do not seem to understand that the brain is susceptible to magnetism because the brain has charge and it is associated with electricity or signals intelligence because the brain runs on electricity. To deny this is willful ignorance. But this message tends to be one of the most difficult to communicate effectively.... |
|
|
|
Post by ydobon on Jun 13, 2018 3:15:24 GMT
Excuse me if I bring this train full circle..... And then to those who would say a machine could not possibly produce altered behavioral states or altered consciousness states do not seem to understand that the brain is susceptible to magnetism because the brain has charge and it is associated with electricity or signals intelligence because the brain runs on electricity. To deny this is willful ignorance. But this message tends to be one of the most difficult to communicate effectively.... Yes! everything is always in motion. Question is...the how, why, what and where of said motion? |
|
