Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 2:30:01 GMT
continued: your experience. (didn't fully fit in title)
Edit: Or just "reality", for better terminology than "your experience".
Actually the word is definitely "reality".
Discuss.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 2:49:46 GMT
I'm actually confused by your two posts, as in I can't actually figure out what exactly it is that you are actually trying to convey. I'm of course not at all putting this on you, or even me for that matter while sort of at the same time admitting perhaps that I can't comprehend what you are attempting to convey, so maybe it is on me, or perhaps just lost in translation as english language is limited, and as a person with virtually 0 air energy in my chart, english is foriegn to me and not me forte.
I guess my thoughts on what I think you might be conveying are that essentially, one should attempt as best they can to live according to Law. 1st level of Law in hierarchy is Natural (/Universal) Law, and 2nd highest is Contract Law. That makes sense to me, that I need to as best I can, align myself with Law else my way of thinking is vulnerable to something that can not change, and that no one is immune from. And if you believe in Crowley, Love is the Law and karma might actually confirm such.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 3:02:52 GMT
Hey aurelle.
I'm basically going in a certain direction with this thread. I think there's an amount of conclusions you can make from this. You can use examples from your life to think about the statement that I share here, but personally none of mine go against it.
For example, if I THINK timelines are real, over time you just simply conclude that they don't and that there's a force beyond thought.
And yes I know my posting style is spontaneous. Here seems much less toxic than GLP. (:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 3:12:33 GMT
Well I certainly dont want t derail the direction of your thread...
I don't actually think of myself as very esoteric, as in it's not my focus, secret societies and initiates and all that jazz, and many of the concepts are above my understanding and even care if I may say. I tend to think of myself as very basic, stick to what I know works, while attempting to explore and expand.
Astrology seems very real to me so when you say timelines I think when Uranus is finally leaving Taurus, Saturn will be in Aries... And of course as above so below applies... And I don't have an exact meaning for this mapped out in my mind but I do have potential concepts game theoried out of what it might mean.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jun 11, 2018 21:40:52 GMT
If your way of thinking cannot create something outside of your experience, then what happens when your way of thinking creates the idea of going to a place you've never been, you go there, and you have a new experience you'd never had before? For example, my new way of thinking is, "I deserve a trip to Costa Rica!" This is new for me, and causes me to do all the planning involved in booking the tickets that eventually leads me to drive down to the airport, hop on a jetplane, and wind up somewhere where I have never had an experience before - in this case, Costa Rica.
I had to come up with a plan to think of a way to have an experience outside of my old experience pool for any of this to happen. Because it is our thinking that determines our behavior and our behavior which informs what we experience, it seems like logic would imply that changing your thinking is the only thing that that could change your experience, not the other way around...
|
|
