|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 6:59:47 GMT
I am summoning Mussolini.. back into a human body as you read this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler#/media/File:Hitlermusso2_edit.jpgYou may have been stopping my momentum at every turn in my life.. thus far.. But I have other ways.. spiritual ways.. to ensure you lose on November 8th The British Clinton Agents that have been datamining me.. shadowing me.. my entire life.. Just so YOU could get elected All that WORK is gonna fall flat HIllary And Katy wipe that smug smirk off your face.. Hillary has been playing you for a fool this entire time.. "Gyrl Powa" "Yayyyy" This is your Cousin Katy... The One you mocked at the convention tonight.. You think YOU are going to Cancel Out MY Vote.. LOL! I am the Head of the Rothschild Clan Katy My VOTE is the Only One that matters |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 7:03:12 GMT
Donald Trump I Empower you with the Strength and Knowledge of Benito Mussolini
Donald Trump I Empower you with the Strength and Knowledge of Benito Mussolini
Donald Trump I Empower you with the Strength and Knowledge of Benito Mussolini
|
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 7:16:12 GMT
My Spirit is in a higher dimension than yours Hillary
No matter how many people you buy off.. No matter how many people you corrupt to Team Clinton.. I have God's Eye.. and Authority
To checkmate you from my current lowly earthly standing..
That's my Job.. My Role.. As THE Judge
On your High Illusionary Pedestal.. you laugh at me.. mock me.. tease me..
The Corrupt British Run US Media.. Supports You.. Despite ALL YOUR CORRUPTION
But here is a PROMISE Hillary
You will Lose the Presidential Election on November 8th Hillary
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 7:41:13 GMT
But she has the entire MSM under her thumb
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Denton on Jul 29, 2016 7:52:45 GMT
Her speech tonight was quite legit
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 7:54:43 GMT
How can you trust a woman like that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darby Reinhardt on Jul 29, 2016 8:34:52 GMT
How can you trust a woman like that? Because I don't know who or what to trust. I don't know how to trust anything bad I have heard of her. She outlined her plans, she has dedicated her self to passing positive bills (even though it could be argued anyone who has graduated high school (or not) could pass positive bills. You can say the main reason individuals are attracted to politics could be money, and that she seems to have a large relation to such (so that alone could question motives)(but it is also possible her presence has positively influences law. I personally do not see myself ever voting, and it only bothers me to attempt to consider who should be president, I have no clue. I cannot even say, if I had to pick, I can only try to think what future path will be most beneficial for the american people. And when it comes down to that, according to Hillarys plans, and experience, and the feeling that, america is not that bad for many people, and Hillary if anything may continue that status quo; I just do not know. Many people have no need to like or desire radical change, many people are locked into their stable and hard worked for lives, and (there other candidates besides Hillary, but if it really feasibly is only Hillary or Trump) Trump, although I cannot fully envision what the future would be like with him as president, it seems like it may have greater potential for instability. So you being against Hillary, makes you for Trump? Or is there a feasible nother? I guess it is hard for me to imagine how an individual could possibly be that two faced; to be corrupt and stand in front of millions, a speech recorded that may exist for hundreds of years, and pretend to be good and righteous; unless she actually believes she is. And lie to millions of people; but I guess there is evidence her husband had no problems doing such. So either she is far from pure, and just does not care at all. and/or feels the positive she has done has made up for her impurities. and/or has convinced herself she is the lesser of two evils so her impurities are not important. and/or she thinks her impurities are broken eggs for the omelette of the 'republic'. and/or we do not fully know the truth. But her speech, did show and tell me things about her that I did not know, as I never had consumed so much information about her and a decent percentage of what I have of which contained impurities of her character I have no way of fully knowing the percentage of validity. However, it does lead credence to the potential of some set upness, that Donald Trump was thought to be an easy strawman for her to waltz in, potentially not as easy as expected. The debates should be interesting, and I do wonder how different things would be if Donald Trump was not the main Republican, if it would have been more or less challenging. |
|
|
|
Post by Therin on Jul 29, 2016 8:37:58 GMT
Somebody kicked the anthill. Or did nobody do it? It was Shia LaBouf that's it. Paper bag on his head.
|
|
|
|
Post by Therin on Jul 29, 2016 8:38:51 GMT
Don't ever bring kung fu to a gun fight.
|
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:41:59 GMT
But she has the entire MSM under her thumb So what.. the MSM are bought and paid for CNN - owned by Aviv Nevo.. a Rothschild Lady Lynn is a Hillary Supporter I know all the people pushing Hillary |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:43:11 GMT
Her speech tonight was quite legit Legit meaning.. someone else wrote it FOR her |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:44:14 GMT
How can you trust a woman like that? You Can't.. that's the thing.. An untrustworthy leader placed into power.. is the worst thing that can happen to a society |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 9:45:22 GMT
How can you trust a woman like that? Because I don't know who or what to trust. I don't know how to trust anything bad I have heard of her. She outlined her plans, she has dedicated her self to passing positive bills (even though it could be argued anyone who has graduated high school (or not) could pass positive bills. You can say the main reason individuals are attracted to politics could be money, and that she seems to have a large relation to such (so that alone could question motives)(but it is also possible her presence has positively influences law. I personally do not see myself ever voting, and it only bothers me to attempt to consider who should be president, I have no clue. I cannot even say, if I had to pick, I can only try to think what future path will be most beneficial for the american people. And when it comes down to that, according to Hillarys plans, and experience, and the feeling that, america is not that bad for many people, and Hillary if anything may continue that status quo; I just do not know. Many people have no need to like or desire radical change, many people are locked into their stable and hard worked for lives, and (there other candidates besides Hillary, but if it really feasibly is only Hillary or Trump) Trump, although I cannot fully envision what the future would be like with him as president, it seems like it may have greater potential for instability. So you being against Hillary, makes you for Trump? Or is there a feasible nother? I guess it is hard for me to imagine how an individual could possibly be that two faced; to be corrupt and stand in front of millions, a speech recorded that may exist for hundreds of years, and pretend to be good and righteous; unless she actually believes she is. And lie to millions of people; but I guess there is evidence her husband had no problems doing such. So either she is far from pure, and just does not care at all. and/or feels the positive she has done has made up for her impurities. and/or has convinced herself she is the lesser of two evils so her impurities are not important. and/or she thinks her impurities are broken eggs for the omelette of the 'republic'. and/or we do not fully know the truth. But her speech, did show and tell me things about her that I did not know, as I never had consumed so much information about her and a decent percentage of what I have of which contained impurities of her character I have no way of fully knowing the percentage of validity. However, it does lead credence to the potential of some set upness, that Donald Trump was thought to be an easy strawman for her to waltz in, potentially not as easy as expected. The debates should be interesting, and I do wonder how different things would be if Donald Trump was not the main Republican, if it would have been more or less challenging. There is clear evidence she lied about bengazi and that she shared classified emails on an unsecured server. Even so, the FBI didn't press charges. Doesn't something about that seem kind of shady? Speeches mean nothing in terms of what a politician is actually going to do in office. It's an art of persuasion called rhetoric and you get a lot of people to help you with hypnotic cadence and impressive talking. But to see if a person really has the character, you have to look at their actions, not their words. Hillary's actions are shady. She is a liar. That means, why should anybody trust her words? |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:45:26 GMT
How can you trust a woman like that? Because I don't know who or what to trust. I don't know how to trust anything bad I have heard of her. She outlined her plans, she has dedicated her self to passing positive bills (even though it could be argued anyone who has graduated high school (or not) could pass positive bills. You can say the main reason individuals are attracted to politics could be money, and that she seems to have a large relation to such (so that alone could question motives)(but it is also possible her presence has positively influences law. I personally do not see myself ever voting, and it only bothers me to attempt to consider who should be president, I have no clue. I cannot even say, if I had to pick, I can only try to think what future path will be most beneficial for the american people. And when it comes down to that, according to Hillarys plans, and experience, and the feeling that, america is not that bad for many people, and Hillary if anything may continue that status quo; I just do not know. Many people have no need to like or desire radical change, many people are locked into their stable and hard worked for lives, and (there other candidates besides Hillary, but if it really feasibly is only Hillary or Trump) Trump, although I cannot fully envision what the future would be like with him as president, it seems like it may have greater potential for instability. So you being against Hillary, makes you for Trump? Or is there a feasible nother? I guess it is hard for me to imagine how an individual could possibly be that two faced; to be corrupt and stand in front of millions, a speech recorded that may exist for hundreds of years, and pretend to be good and righteous; unless she actually believes she is. And lie to millions of people; but I guess there is evidence her husband had no problems doing such. So either she is far from pure, and just does not care at all. and/or feels the positive she has done has made up for her impurities. and/or has convinced herself she is the lesser of two evils so her impurities are not important. and/or she thinks her impurities are broken eggs for the omelette of the 'republic'. and/or we do not fully know the truth. But her speech, did show and tell me things about her that I did not know, as I never had consumed so much information about her and a decent percentage of what I have of which contained impurities of her character I have no way of fully knowing the percentage of validity. However, it does lead credence to the potential of some set upness, that Donald Trump was thought to be an easy strawman for her to waltz in, potentially not as easy as expected. The debates should be interesting, and I do wonder how different things would be if Donald Trump was not the main Republican, if it would have been more or less challenging. I have inside information that you don't.. If Hillary wins the Rothschild Family is having her invade Syria.. to set up a Central Bank |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:46:12 GMT
Don't ever bring kung fu to a gun fight. Kung Fu.. try.. controlling Dimensions and Time |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:46:59 GMT
Somebody kicked the anthill. Or did nobody do it? It was Shia LaBouf that's it. Paper bag on his head. Even Stevens |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 9:47:48 GMT
And WHEN (not if) I Become President I will write you out of the History Books Hillary
|
|
|
|
Post by ,, on Jul 29, 2016 21:30:03 GMT
Because I don't know who or what to trust. I don't know how to trust anything bad I have heard of her. She outlined her plans, she has dedicated her self to passing positive bills (even though it could be argued anyone who has graduated high school (or not) could pass positive bills. You can say the main reason individuals are attracted to politics could be money, and that she seems to have a large relation to such (so that alone could question motives)(but it is also possible her presence has positively influences law. I personally do not see myself ever voting, and it only bothers me to attempt to consider who should be president, I have no clue. I cannot even say, if I had to pick, I can only try to think what future path will be most beneficial for the american people. And when it comes down to that, according to Hillarys plans, and experience, and the feeling that, america is not that bad for many people, and Hillary if anything may continue that status quo; I just do not know. Many people have no need to like or desire radical change, many people are locked into their stable and hard worked for lives, and (there other candidates besides Hillary, but if it really feasibly is only Hillary or Trump) Trump, although I cannot fully envision what the future would be like with him as president, it seems like it may have greater potential for instability. So you being against Hillary, makes you for Trump? Or is there a feasible nother? I guess it is hard for me to imagine how an individual could possibly be that two faced; to be corrupt and stand in front of millions, a speech recorded that may exist for hundreds of years, and pretend to be good and righteous; unless she actually believes she is. And lie to millions of people; but I guess there is evidence her husband had no problems doing such. So either she is far from pure, and just does not care at all. and/or feels the positive she has done has made up for her impurities. and/or has convinced herself she is the lesser of two evils so her impurities are not important. and/or she thinks her impurities are broken eggs for the omelette of the 'republic'. and/or we do not fully know the truth. But her speech, did show and tell me things about her that I did not know, as I never had consumed so much information about her and a decent percentage of what I have of which contained impurities of her character I have no way of fully knowing the percentage of validity. However, it does lead credence to the potential of some set upness, that Donald Trump was thought to be an easy strawman for her to waltz in, potentially not as easy as expected. The debates should be interesting, and I do wonder how different things would be if Donald Trump was not the main Republican, if it would have been more or less challenging. There is clear evidence she lied about bengazi and that she shared classified emails on an unsecured server. Even so, the FBI didn't press charges. Doesn't something about that seem kind of shady? Speeches mean nothing in terms of what a politician is actually going to do in office. It's an art of persuasion called rhetoric and you get a lot of people to help you with hypnotic cadence and impressive talking. But to see if a person really has the character, you have to look at their actions, not their words. Hillary's actions are shady. She is a liar. That means, why should anybody trust her words? I am not picking anyone, but you didn't answer, if not Hillary, who? |
|
Christophorus Swordlword
Guest
|
Post by Christophorus Swordlword on Jul 29, 2016 21:41:33 GMT
Because I don't know who or what to trust. I don't know how to trust anything bad I have heard of her. She outlined her plans, she has dedicated her self to passing positive bills (even though it could be argued anyone who has graduated high school (or not) could pass positive bills. You can say the main reason individuals are attracted to politics could be money, and that she seems to have a large relation to such (so that alone could question motives)(but it is also possible her presence has positively influences law. I personally do not see myself ever voting, and it only bothers me to attempt to consider who should be president, I have no clue. I cannot even say, if I had to pick, I can only try to think what future path will be most beneficial for the american people. And when it comes down to that, according to Hillarys plans, and experience, and the feeling that, america is not that bad for many people, and Hillary if anything may continue that status quo; I just do not know. Many people have no need to like or desire radical change, many people are locked into their stable and hard worked for lives, and (there other candidates besides Hillary, but if it really feasibly is only Hillary or Trump) Trump, although I cannot fully envision what the future would be like with him as president, it seems like it may have greater potential for instability. So you being against Hillary, makes you for Trump? Or is there a feasible nother? I guess it is hard for me to imagine how an individual could possibly be that two faced; to be corrupt and stand in front of millions, a speech recorded that may exist for hundreds of years, and pretend to be good and righteous; unless she actually believes she is. And lie to millions of people; but I guess there is evidence her husband had no problems doing such. So either she is far from pure, and just does not care at all. and/or feels the positive she has done has made up for her impurities. and/or has convinced herself she is the lesser of two evils so her impurities are not important. and/or she thinks her impurities are broken eggs for the omelette of the 'republic'. and/or we do not fully know the truth. But her speech, did show and tell me things about her that I did not know, as I never had consumed so much information about her and a decent percentage of what I have of which contained impurities of her character I have no way of fully knowing the percentage of validity. However, it does lead credence to the potential of some set upness, that Donald Trump was thought to be an easy strawman for her to waltz in, potentially not as easy as expected. The debates should be interesting, and I do wonder how different things would be if Donald Trump was not the main Republican, if it would have been more or less challenging. I have inside information that you don't.. If Hillary wins the Rothschild Family is having her invade Syria.. to set up a Central Bank After central banks in every country then what? In one moment forgive all the debts owed to them and turn them all into non for profits? |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 21:42:40 GMT
I have inside information that you don't.. If Hillary wins the Rothschild Family is having her invade Syria.. to set up a Central Bank After central banks in every country then what? In one moment forgive all the debts owed to them and turn them all into non for profits? One World Currency |
|
