[ti]weather[/ti]Brain Wash News

We do not need to go abroad for fake news:

in the NOS news journalism disappears from the news and government policy wrapped in sentiment forced upon the viewer. Wednesday began the eight o'clock news with an item about organ donation. As a ringmaster at an interest chants About Rob: "Children in elementary school should already receive information about organ donation." Really? Who believes that? Prompt the blonde head of an unnamed lady in the picture. She says it's important for parents to know how their children think about it.

The opening tune of the log howls meanwhile by. The question matures why this opening news. Does the Minister of Education budget for free school education? psychologists are sounding the alarm about mental problems in children about donation options? Of course not. About recounts that the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) calls for education of children at a very young age. The blonde lady reappears: she turns Marion Siebelink UMCG. It is still unclear why it is newsworthy. If the NIS does not provide any information, Google offers a solution: Siebelink show program manager at the transplant center of the UMCG and involved in the Dutch Transplant Commission. For years she promotes the school self-developed teaching materials. Old news. Why does the NIS with it now? Nothing about it. The journal continues with an emotive case. Suddenly we're their child lost in a tragic accident last month in the backyard of parents. Heartbreaking. Father and mother tell admirably restrained and rational about their choice for organ donation. A decision based on conversations they had with their son. Touching.

The voice of the journal adds: "Tijmen donated eight organs." Suddenly confused, still dazed by the shining story, you realize how the journal takes you by the nose with emotional blackmail. Because the deceased boy donated himself nothing, of course. However, the NIS presents the donation as his last act of will, to play on the emotions of the viewer. And beduusde viewer, which still does not know why the old packages Mrs Siebelink are big news, did not return it. What else can you do but show respect for these parents and their choice? People who also want to impose one thing, so free of value judgments they spoke. The deployment of this case where you decently nothing can bring against it, shows the manipulative journalism from the NIS. The tragic incident will be used to illustrate the importance of a positive donor registration. The NIS is about the transfer of guilt, everyone who hears these parents and myself contemplating else should feel bad. Otherwise, the news had left others in the room who chose after talks with their child not to donate. That was a good example of the importance of such a conversation.

But the NOS translates discuss donation automatically convince donation. While there are many reasons, including ideological, not to donate. Respectable choices people make are not morally inferior. The NOS who does not show. Creaky however comes in the final seconds of the item the actual news: Bruins Minister of Health Wednesday launched a campaign on organ donation. More about the news does not tell. However, the minister is displayed to confess that he has not talked about donation with his children, but he recommends such a conversation in schools. More guilt, served by a mea culpa of a minister who was determined relieved that the NIS did not bring the real news: that criticism of the Chamber came to its campaign titled "(Not) to choose is a choice." The cryptic title and the contents were unclear for millions of people. Which also raises the question of why the ministry two years before the new donorwet enters everyone is automatically a donor, more money spent on a campaign to encourage registration. Since the NIS does not ask. Not even the rickety law that can not be explained.

Everything seems to forget about this controversial law. To deliver the government not suffer, NIS puts emotion in order to distract from the lack of journalistic questions. After the item I wondered why school children to be difficult cases with government propaganda organ donation which is packaged as life questions that would suit their age. Hello everyone, says the teacher, today we'll talk about your organs after your death, so mom and dad can then easily make a choice. Insane, but it boils down to. Disturbed There are hardly any teachers for primary schools. Schools are about four days per week, and in the limited time that remains to be exerted moral pressure on small children about choices related to their death? Disturbed. The freedom of the child as not to be doing, is violated by donorideologen promoting a law that violates a basic human right: the autonomy over their own bodies. Shame on you, TV network news, you fawning cooperate in this brainwashing.
Show original