|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 18, 2021 5:51:29 GMT
He violated the law, lied, frauded, blasphemed and destroyed property.
Torture and crucifixion were according to the law and moral to do.
Change my mind.
|
|
|
Post by panthers on Jan 18, 2021 20:13:16 GMT
or likely recognized all the NPC's as himself and bore all responsibility for their actions, rather than have them all be destroyed.
|
|
|
Post by Judocus Geimhreadh on Jan 18, 2021 20:46:25 GMT
He violated the law, lied, frauded, blasphemed and destroyed property. Torture and crucifixion were according to the law and moral to do. Change my mind. I just have some questions... How did he lie? How did he commit fraud?
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 18, 2021 22:05:34 GMT
He violated the law, lied, frauded, blasphemed and destroyed property. Torture and crucifixion were according to the law and moral to do. Change my mind. I just have some questions... How did he lie? How did he commit fraud? Read the bible i have no time now.
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 18, 2021 22:07:09 GMT
or likely recognized all the NPC's as himself and bore all responsibility for their actions, rather than have them all be destroyed. NPC is modern day lingo that I don't recognize or understand. Can you explain what you mean? Did you think he was realistic and effective in his chosen path?
|
|
|
Post by panthers on Jan 19, 2021 0:58:59 GMT
or likely recognized all the NPC's as himself and bore all responsibility for their actions, rather than have them all be destroyed. NPC is modern day lingo that I don't recognize or understand. Can you explain what you mean? Did you think he was realistic and effective in his chosen path? Hi, yes NPC concept is fairly new, yet it's an ancient idea. The term Non Playable Character or NPC refers to characters in a video game that you cannot pick, or "play". If the world is in fact a digital creation, everyone in the world is to be considered a NPC. only player 1 and player 2 respectively would be the playable characters. in the christian account, player 1 would of been Jesus Christ. only player one could cheatcode miracles, respectively. however at the time, there were no concepts to tell the NPC's how the digital world really works. but by using ancient concepts, player 1 secretly and successfully conveyed this to us. meaning that the digital world is more ancient than we think. the grand message from player one, is that there is a player two, a player three, etc etc.. but the is only offered to those who believe in player 1, and such a game. the world was built by npc's, and player 1 is totally obsessed with the world and the npc's this obsession is called love. hopefully you can begin to see the parallels,
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 19, 2021 1:06:28 GMT
NPC is modern day lingo that I don't recognize or understand. Can you explain what you mean? Did you think he was realistic and effective in his chosen path? Hi, yes NPC concept is fairly new, yet it's an ancient idea. The term Non Playable Character or NPC refers to characters in a video game that you cannot pick, or "play". If the world is in fact a digital creation, everyone in the world is to be considered a NPC. only player 1 and player 2 respectively would be the playable characters. in the christian account, player 1 would of been Jesus Christ. only player one could cheatcode miracles, respectively. however at the time, there were no concepts to tell the NPC's how the digital world really works. but by using ancient concepts, player 1 secretly and successfully conveyed this to us. meaning that the digital world is more ancient than we think. the grand message from player one, is that there is a player two, a player three, etc etc.. but the is only offered to those who believe in player 1, and such a game. the world was built by npc's, and player 1 is totally obsessed with the world and the npc's this obsession is called love. hopefully you can begin to see the parallels, If I read your post from end to beginning it makes more sense.
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 19, 2021 1:07:11 GMT
At the same time it does not live up to my standards, sorry.
|
|
|
Post by panthers on Jan 19, 2021 1:31:51 GMT
At the same time it does not live up to my standards, sorry. don't be sorry, but what is your standards if you don't mind me asking, im new here so forgive me hehe
|
|
|
Post by blah on Jan 19, 2021 7:43:27 GMT
or likely recognized all the NPC's as himself and bore all responsibility for their actions, rather than have them all be destroyed. wow...somebody who has a clue. why would you sacrifice your own child for everybody else? unless....unless...your son was 'woke'..
|
|
|
Post by blah on Jan 19, 2021 7:44:19 GMT
here's another....why would you send your children as sheep to be slaughtered by wolves? does that make sense?
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 19, 2021 9:16:19 GMT
At the same time it does not live up to my standards, sorry. don't be sorry, but what is your standards if you don't mind me asking, im new here so forgive me hehe I am slowly finding out. Integrating what I know from psychology and philosophy that i have studied. You put thoughts into your posts. So I do appreciate your outlook and thoughts. I am still struggling with mine.
|
|
|
Post by panthers on Jan 19, 2021 20:29:14 GMT
here's another....why would you send your children as sheep to be slaughtered by wolves? does that make sense? in the terms that you presented no, nobody would do what you suggest... so likely your interpretation of what actually happened is not correct. the correct way to answer this, is to first question the premise. why did player one let himself be tortured and killed by the NPC's? or as you interpret, why did the father let his son be sacrificed like a lamb? the answer is that there is only one character in the world, doing it all unto itself, the reason is obvious... to have a specific character formed in the end. this character will know a little bit about everything, even of what true misery and torture is... for no one receives a full kingdom, any other way.
|
|
|
Post by Industrial Devil on Jan 20, 2021 13:05:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by 3.50 on Jan 20, 2021 18:18:53 GMT
He violated the law, lied, frauded, blasphemed and destroyed property. Torture and crucifixion were according to the law and moral to do. Change my mind. That is what the reflective row men deep state would have you be leaf.
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Jan 20, 2021 21:49:05 GMT
He violated the law, lied, frauded, blasphemed and destroyed property. Torture and crucifixion were according to the law and moral to do. Change my mind. That is what the reflective row men deep state would have you be leaf. can you think for yourself for a second? i used to be a christian and had 20 years to ponder and read up on this figure read Roman and Jewish law
|
|
|
Post by Jew of the Kings on Jan 21, 2021 7:27:21 GMT
I think in the end God forsaken him for a reason. He didn't need to be "King of the Jews", yet he still clung on to the title at the cost if his own death. If one doesnt believe in earthly possessions is not a title a superficial thing aswell? He could have just said he was just an himself and lived and continued to do all his works but he just haaad to be King of the Jews.
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Feb 16, 2021 15:27:39 GMT
If you remember correctly, after the torture and crucifixion of Yoshua Ben Joseph (Jew), YHWH threw this obedient son into hell...
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Feb 16, 2021 15:28:08 GMT
Loving god you worship... would you rape and kill some lil kids to for Him too?
|
|
|
Post by Corvus Dei on Feb 16, 2021 15:29:35 GMT
Jesus rejected the crown that was offered to him...
|
|