|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:21:41 GMT
The isles of astral supremacy have seven Sects
The Mountain
The Desert
The Garden
The Valley
The Ocean
The Cavern
The Woods
|
|
|
|
Post by ? on Jul 31, 2016 2:23:39 GMT
You misunderstand. It was the past age's burden to save the world from itself. In this new time, the challenge becomes who is willing to teach the world to save itself. I do misunderstand, what is the difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:25:44 GMT
You misunderstand. It was the past age's burden to save the world from itself. In this new time, the challenge becomes who is willing to teach the world to save itself. I do misunderstand, what is the difference. 1) Superman saves you from evil shark 2) Superman gives you superpowers and you can beat up sharks without him now Quite different |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:32:49 GMT
In the mythos of our script universe the archons are aspects of hyperdimensional intelligence which spectates the shadow game. They are the architects of the timeless arena , not heirs to genii but the petri dish that gave nutrients for genii to form. Now they cannot help but be alerted to this new "thing" potentiating on the experimental aquarium we call earth. Omegas, as ultra might name them, have no precedent for these happenings and there is a split in the opinions of these outre-lifeforms whether or not to interfere. On the astral, the outre has the ability to condense and mingle with mortal. The hyperdimensional shining deities are the origin of the olympians, the immortals, all wars between them as man's "gods" metaphor for that which the offspring of celestia - man - with its dual hybrid nature, and chaotic progression, has not always been befit to comprehend. Thusly the ultimate mystic truths have always been channeled distorted and comprehended in lenses that obsfucate the nature of source.
|
|
|
|
Post by ? on Jul 31, 2016 2:33:20 GMT
You misunderstand. It was the past age's burden to save the world from itself. In this new time, the challenge becomes who is willing to teach the world to save itself. Moreover who is able. What about the world needs saving (lets say, changing)? |
|
|
|
Post by ? on Jul 31, 2016 2:35:00 GMT
I do misunderstand, what is the difference. 1) Superman saves you from evil shark 2) Superman gives you superpowers and you can beat up sharks without him now Quite different How has there not always (for a while now) existed the knowledge and ability to beat up sharks? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:36:21 GMT
You misunderstand. It was the past age's burden to save the world from itself. In this new time, the challenge becomes who is willing to teach the world to save itself. Moreover who is able. What about the world needs saving (lets say, changing)? Change is the inevitable nature of reality. The story of humanity is a story of conflict. Without conflict no story need be written, and in that case we wouldn't be discussing the script. |
|
|
|
Post by ? on Jul 31, 2016 2:38:35 GMT
What about the world needs saving (lets say, changing)? Change is the inevitable nature of reality. The story of humanity is a story of conflict. Without conflict no story need be written, and in that case we wouldn't be discussing the script. What is the end/beginning/better continuing game? What are the goals? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:40:32 GMT
1) Superman saves you from evil shark 2) Superman gives you superpowers and you can beat up sharks without him now Quite different How has there not always (for a while now) existed the knowledge and ability to beat up sharks? You are taking the analogy too literally. Let's say the sharks are something that only superheroes could defeat. In the past stories of heroes were stories of projected identification with the powerful. In the future, they will be stories about students and teachers. |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 31, 2016 2:41:07 GMT
You misunderstand. It was the past age's burden to save the world from itself. In this new time, the challenge becomes who is willing to teach the world to save itself. Moreover who is able. What about the world needs saving (lets say, changing)? Define the terms.. of 'saving' You have to take control of the Financial System with an Asset backed No Debt Currency You have to create the technology to manage the timeline.. and control all important events You have to create technology to keep negative energy spirits trapped and the positive spirits rise You have to change the incentive structure to encourage and incentivize people to create.. rather than siphon energies You have to genetically engineer all the animistic dna out of humans Good Luck! |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:42:07 GMT
Change is the inevitable nature of reality. The story of humanity is a story of conflict. Without conflict no story need be written, and in that case we wouldn't be discussing the script. What is the end/beginning/better continuing game? What are the goals? The goal depends on your ideology. If there was unanimous agreement there would be no conflict and thus no story. See the OP. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:45:55 GMT
From the war of the worlds is born the war between worlds
|
|
|
|
Post by ? on Jul 31, 2016 2:45:57 GMT
What is the end/beginning/better continuing game? What are the goals? The goal depends on your ideology. If there was unanimous agreement there would be no conflict and thus no story. See the OP. What are the goals of your ideology? |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 31, 2016 2:48:45 GMT
The goal depends on your ideology. If there was unanimous agreement there would be no conflict and thus no story. See the OP. What are the goals of your ideology? To get my Wick Wet with Storybook Ideas.. |
|
on one knee ....(will you....
Guest
|
Post by on one knee ....(will you.... on Jul 31, 2016 2:51:05 GMT
From the war of the worlds is born the war between worlds Will you marinate the proper words into a telling stew as twhat our first mission shall be, o master scion? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 2:52:02 GMT
The goal depends on your ideology. If there was unanimous agreement there would be no conflict and thus no story. See the OP. What are the goals of your ideology? This isn't a thread for discussing my ideology, it's a thread for discussing the story that'll complete the aeon archetype and the elements the story will contain. |
|
|
|
Post by . on Jul 31, 2016 3:11:23 GMT
What are the goals of your ideology? This isn't a thread for discussing my ideology, it's a thread for discussing the story that'll complete the aeon archetype and the elements the story will contain. I guess I asked about ideology, as I figured the story might include ideology, and possibly even depend on it. Completing the aeon, might relate to ideology, and if such might be good, and you might desire such, than the ideology you claim might be related to such. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 3:18:54 GMT
Well the question is destruction / apocalypse or redemption / transcendence
|
|
|
|
Post by . on Jul 31, 2016 3:28:51 GMT
Well the question is destruction / apocalypse or redemption / transcendence "An apocalypse (Ancient Greek: ἀποκάλυψις apokálypsis, from ἀπό and καλύπτω meaning "uncovering"), translated literally from Greek, is a disclosure of knowledge, i.e., a lifting of the veil or revelation. In religious contexts it is usually a disclosure of something hidden, “a vision of heavenly secrets that can make sense of earthly realities"." - wiki Who would desire destruction?. What would transcendence entail? |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 31, 2016 3:34:54 GMT
Well the question is destruction / apocalypse or redemption / transcendence "An apocalypse (Ancient Greek: ἀποκάλυψις apokálypsis, from ἀπό and καλύπτω meaning "uncovering"), translated literally from Greek, is a disclosure of knowledge, i.e., a lifting of the veil or revelation. In religious contexts it is usually a disclosure of something hidden, “a vision of heavenly secrets that can make sense of earthly realities"." - wiki Who would desire destruction?. What would transcendence entail? Some believe the universe needs to start over because the experiment of mankind has failed. Transcendence would mean the age of magic would begin anew. Consciousness would once again be in contract with the ineffable. Ability to energetically form the world through active will would once again usher in the golden age, kali yuga of divinity and a new form of human consciousness. Not a "new race" in the eugenics sense but a new race in the lamarckian sense. |
|
