|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:04:31 GMT
I Don't Support Hillary
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:06:35 GMT
Can you try the title again without the double negative? Double negatives confuse me.
|
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:09:11 GMT
Can you try the title again without the double negative? Double negatives confuse me. Ha Vent |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:15:22 GMT
So in essence you are saying she does think you've grown up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2016 10:16:06 GMT
lol
lol
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:16:35 GMT
Merely the fact that all of the biggest names in the world are rallying behind her should be proof in the pudding she is an illuminati pawn.
I really, don't like trump though.
Still - and I mean honestly, I'm mad at bernie for throwing his lot in with her.
Bernie was muh mahn.
|
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:18:46 GMT
So in essence you are saying she does think you've grown up? Exactly.. But I am not the one supporting a woman who is going to invade Syria.. for the Rothschild Family in order to Set up a Central Bank Katy doesn't do her homework.. high school drop out and all |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:19:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:24:16 GMT
So in essence you are saying she does think you've grown up? Exactly.. But I am not the one supporting a woman who is going to invade Syria.. for the Rothschild Family in order to Set up a Central Bank Katy doesn't do her homework.. high school drop out and all I don't think she has a choice. What celebs say is all controlled. They don't even have to pay her. It's just a , "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" type of arrangement. |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:25:24 GMT
Exactly.. But I am not the one supporting a woman who is going to invade Syria.. for the Rothschild Family in order to Set up a Central Bank Katy doesn't do her homework.. high school drop out and all I don't think she has a choice. What celebs say is all controlled. They don't even have to pay her. It's just a , "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" type of arrangement. There is always a choice.. I am living proof.. Eye never took the Satanic Oath like those two did |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:26:57 GMT
I don't think she has a choice. What celebs say is all controlled. They don't even have to pay her. It's just a , "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" type of arrangement. There is always a choice.. I am living proof.. Eye never took the Satanic Oath like those two did Well, if you're that big of a public figure you do what your told or the people putting you on the air pull your airtime. |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:29:01 GMT
There is always a choice.. I am living proof.. Eye never took the Satanic Oath like those two did Well, if you're that big of a public figure you do what your told or the people putting you on the air pull your airtime. Trump.. is living proof that speaking your mind.. works |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:30:29 GMT
Well, if you're that big of a public figure you do what your told or the people putting you on the air pull your airtime. Trump.. is living proof that speaking your mind.. works He had the money to pull his own punches. That guy is the exception which proves the rule. |
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:35:58 GMT
Trump.. is living proof that speaking your mind.. works He had the money to pull his own punches. That guy is the exception which proves the rule. Trump was groomed perfectly.. under the radar.. hidden in plain site |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 10:47:57 GMT
Hill says she'll create an economy where "everybody who wants a good job can get a good job".
Well that would be pretty fucking sweet.
I have no idea how she'd deliver, but yep, sure that would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Jul 29, 2016 10:50:00 GMT
Hill says she'll create an economy where "everybody who wants a good job can get a good job". Well that would be pretty fucking sweet. I have no idea how she'd deliver, but yep, sure that would be nice. The US economy is falling apart because of the law of entropy |
|
|
|
Post by John Dewfess on Jul 29, 2016 22:42:41 GMT
Still - and I mean honestly, I'm mad at bernie for throwing his lot in with her. Bernie was muh mahn. I dont know if Bernie had any real chance to win the presidency, who knows if things are or are not rigged and to what degrees and how things would have played out purely, but I do not know if half of America would have voted for Bernie; and if it would be between Hillary, Bernie, and Trump, then that would only increase the chance of Trump winning, which you can potentially see why there is the desire for 2 party system, because imagine like 5 actual potential candidates or more, how much that would split the votes and electoral, it would mean the 'majority' would be smaller and smaller percentages; instead this way, smaller and smaller percentages pool together to form relatively 2 distinct ones. So, if there was very little chance of Bernie winning (and, from my complete ignorance, it seemed that way, and I also cannot say I am knowledgeable about how the future would have played out if Bernie actually won) it was likely the right thing for him to team up with a seemingly good chance to win, so that some of his ideas might be implemented. Though yeah, I do not know how America would have voted if it was between Bernie and Trump, debates would have been interesting. Hillary is the status quo, with promises for the status quo to improve for those who desire it to, and many people are comfortable with the status quo and such promises. One of the thing that is often overlooked, is the power of congress, but that is the whole, money in politics thing, and she touched upon that and who knows if anything will be done about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Jul 29, 2016 22:44:31 GMT
Still - and I mean honestly, I'm mad at bernie for throwing his lot in with her. Bernie was muh mahn. I dont know if Bernie had any real chance to win the presidency, who knows if things are or are not rigged and to what degrees and how things would have played out purely, but I do not know if half of America would have voted for Bernie; and if it would be between Hillary, Bernie, and Trump, then that would only increase the chance of Trump winning, which you can potentially see why there is the desire for 2 party system, because imagine like 5 actual potential candidates or more, how much that would split the votes and electoral, it would mean the 'majority' would be smaller and smaller percentages; instead this way, smaller and smaller percentages pool together to form relatively 2 distinct ones. So, if there was very little chance of Bernie winning (and, from my complete ignorance, it seemed that way, and I also cannot say I am knowledgeable about how the future would have played out if Bernie actually won) it was likely the right thing for him to team up with a seemingly good chance to win, so that some of his ideas might be implemented. Though yeah, I do not know how America would have voted if it was between Bernie and Trump, debates would have been interesting. Hillary is the status quo, with promises for the status quo to improve for those who desire it to, and many people are comfortable with the status quo and such promises. One of the thing that is often overlooked, is the power of congress, but that is the whole, money in politics thing, and she touched upon that and who knows if anything will be done about it. There was little chance of bernie winning due to the very corruption in the political system that Hillary herself is a part of, not directly responsible for, but a member of the group that carries out such acts of corruption. Yes he couldn't have maintained his image and backed anyone other than Hillary. Hillary says "she will give good jobs to people who want good jobs". Why should I believe her? |
|
|
|
Post by Derra Licht on Jul 29, 2016 22:48:37 GMT
Hey, Caylus, have you ever had a forum before (a year or more ago)? I don't know if I just had dejavu or, something |
|
Ignoblious Derpitino
Guest
|
Post by Ignoblious Derpitino on Jul 29, 2016 23:08:48 GMT
I dont know if Bernie had any real chance to win the presidency, who knows if things are or are not rigged and to what degrees and how things would have played out purely, but I do not know if half of America would have voted for Bernie; and if it would be between Hillary, Bernie, and Trump, then that would only increase the chance of Trump winning, which you can potentially see why there is the desire for 2 party system, because imagine like 5 actual potential candidates or more, how much that would split the votes and electoral, it would mean the 'majority' would be smaller and smaller percentages; instead this way, smaller and smaller percentages pool together to form relatively 2 distinct ones. So, if there was very little chance of Bernie winning (and, from my complete ignorance, it seemed that way, and I also cannot say I am knowledgeable about how the future would have played out if Bernie actually won) it was likely the right thing for him to team up with a seemingly good chance to win, so that some of his ideas might be implemented. Though yeah, I do not know how America would have voted if it was between Bernie and Trump, debates would have been interesting. Hillary is the status quo, with promises for the status quo to improve for those who desire it to, and many people are comfortable with the status quo and such promises. One of the thing that is often overlooked, is the power of congress, but that is the whole, money in politics thing, and she touched upon that and who knows if anything will be done about it. There was little chance of bernie winning due to the very corruption in the political system that Hillary herself is a part of, not directly responsible for, but a member of the group that carries out such acts of corruption. Yes he couldn't have maintained his image and backed anyone other than Hillary. Hillary says "she will give good jobs to people who want good jobs". Why should I believe her? I saw some humanity in her, in her speaking. Even that her mind was full of so many aspects of functioning world and peopledom, (and I know.. speech, but still (there was a sense of knowledge and realness in what she spoke of, even though there was an awkwardness in some of her delivery, some of what she said must be true, how she has helped those in need, though yes I know it could be an easy theatrical tool); one of the big kickers though for me, is the fact that if I were a multi multi millionaire, I would probably rather spend any 4 years laying on a tropical island beach than in the oval office; Trump is in that same boat; is there really not such thing as having enough money; or you think at that point, it might be the desire for legacy, pride, and belief that it will impress those around, like feeling as if those in high places would have to depend on her and treat her nice, if they want favors? Or simply, because the elites need individuals who share their desires in high places, to look out for them, and Hillary is that, sure anyone can throw bones to the poor, but certainly that is not what is most valuable about life, commerce and politics; the stable and secure world of wealth and family and impressive achievement, of luxury and commissioning of art and science, of being big and medium and massive players in the great game of life; that is the real world; everything else is a distasteful distraction; who cares if 1,000 or 1,000,000 or 10 people need a job, whats the difference; surely enough food and clean water exists for them to eat, sleep and be entertained for a life; now quit the buzzing, the world has always been perfect as long as one has their health and such does not last for ever; how much time must I waste caring for each one in need, what can be done to make it so I or noone ever has to care for anyone other than oneself again (is that not the goal of progression and freedom)? |
|
