|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 17, 2017 21:04:36 GMT
According to Trin this is not the case. Trin could be lying, but I guess people are going to find out soon enough
It is absolutely bullshit. And now this guy Shekels has dedicated quite a lot of time to "exposing" GLP and made himself a laughingstock. Quite frankly, there are many more things I can think of to spend $4.5 million on. Owning GLP seems like more hassle than anything else. The admin are routinely harassed and villainized, Trin had an actual stalker show up at his place, and you deal with crazies like this SSP on a daily basis, all day, every day. Who the fuck would want to subject themselves to that? And newsflash, idiots. Any thing the government wants to keep a secret WILL BE KEPT A SECRET. Maybe they have people watching that site but if they want to watch, they will find another way to do it than on the fucking internet on a tinfoil hat forum. Give me a fucking break. I was trying to be polite about it. I am sure what you say has a lot of merit to it and I do not disagree. SSP aka CM has been through tough times which I am sure is of no concern to you, nor should it be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 17, 2017 22:08:59 GMT
If your claim is legitimate you will have the last laugh CM. No need to antagonize the place. According to Trin this is not the case. Trin could be lying, but I guess people are going to find out soon enough
I wouldn't hazard a guess as to why antagonize a place you want to buy or people you'd want to buy from, but if you actually had that kind of money it wouldn't matter. Hypothetically |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 17, 2017 22:10:33 GMT
Chris, I don't know how I feel about you anymore. It's probably safest to regard you as a wildcard emotionally speaking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 18, 2017 1:34:58 GMT
I was referring to chrispy btw not ssp
|
|
|
|
Post by not Crispy. Chewy. on Apr 18, 2017 1:57:19 GMT
It is absolutely bullshit. And now this guy Shekels has dedicated quite a lot of time to "exposing" GLP and made himself a laughingstock. Quite frankly, there are many more things I can think of to spend $4.5 million on. Owning GLP seems like more hassle than anything else. The admin are routinely harassed and villainized, Trin had an actual stalker show up at his place, and you deal with crazies like this SSP on a daily basis, all day, every day. Who the fuck would want to subject themselves to that? And newsflash, idiots. Any thing the government wants to keep a secret WILL BE KEPT A SECRET. Maybe they have people watching that site but if they want to watch, they will find another way to do it than on the fucking internet on a tinfoil hat forum. Give me a fucking break. I was trying to be polite about it. I am sure what you say has a lot of merit to it and I do not disagree. SSP aka CM has been through tough times which I am sure is of no concern to you, nor should it be.
You are right, it is of no concern to me. I could care less about CM but if I choose to make it my business, I will do so at my own discretion, not yours. As for telling people he is going to own GLP, what he is doing is making himself a target from all angles. Climbing atop the proverbial rooftops and shouting it as the populace only puts a target on his back for multitudes to come at him over and over and over again. He shows his vulnerabilities by trying to make himself a big shot. As I said, surely there are a horde of other things one could do with $4.5 million. Hell, for all that money, why not just start your own giant forum? That much money could buy you quite the website. Who would want to have a life like Trinity's where he has to be overly paranoid about his location, identity and comings and goings for the simple fact that people get freakishly obsessed with him? There was a whole discussion on AE and ICOM about that incident where some guy showed up at his house and the cops (the Feds even) got involved and the person was charged. You'd want that? No way. Not me. If I was going to start a forum, I'd do it anonymously. |
|
|
|
Post by not Crispy. Chewy. on Apr 18, 2017 2:02:05 GMT
According to Trin this is not the case. Trin could be lying, but I guess people are going to find out soon enough
I wouldn't hazard a guess as to why antagonize a place you want to buy or people you'd want to buy from, but if you actually had that kind of money it wouldn't matter. Hypothetically Because he's not buying it! FFS don't believe everything you read on the internet. Seriously, think about it. Either he's being tricked into believing he's buying it for whatever reason or is delusional and fooling himself. Again, why spend ALL that money to buy a website? Does that make ANY sense to you? Don't you think if you have that kind of dough, you'd just invest in your own site and all the marketing and promo you need to get it off the ground? THINK, Kayli. Jeebus. |
|
|
|
Post by . on Apr 18, 2017 2:04:48 GMT
"with $4.5 million" Memberships: ?? Ad Revenue:?? Definitely Not Top Secret Funding: ?? Pretending To Make Moves To Own The Site: priceless? For everything else theres bastardbard |
|
|
|
Post by not Crispy. Chewy. on Apr 18, 2017 2:05:48 GMT
Chris, I don't know how I feel about you anymore. It's probably safest to regard you as a wildcard emotionally speaking. Why? Because he's not a sycophant who agrees with everything you say? Because he thinks logically? Because he weighs all angles? Hey, I don't agree with him all the time either but our pal Chrispy ain't no dummy. He's a fence sitter and he moves where the wind blows him that day but I am certain if you were loyal to him, he would have been loyal to you. But you weren't. Once Chrispy trusts, he TRUSTS and he won't waver. It just takes him a while to get there. Just my observation from afar, anyway. Chrispy gets fed up. He sees people acting stupid and he just gets fed up. |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 18, 2017 2:44:20 GMT
Chris, I don't know how I feel about you anymore. It's probably safest to regard you as a wildcard emotionally speaking. Why? Because he's not a sycophant who agrees with everything you say? Because he thinks logically? Because he weighs all angles? Hey, I don't agree with him all the time either but our pal Chrispy ain't no dummy. He's a fence sitter and he moves where the wind blows him that day but I am certain if you were loyal to him, he would have been loyal to you. But you weren't. Once Chrispy trusts, he TRUSTS and he won't waver. It just takes him a while to get there. Just my observation from afar, anyway. Chrispy gets fed up. He sees people acting stupid and he just gets fed up. " A great conflict was about to come off between the Birds and the Beasts. When the two armies were collected together the Bat hesitated which to join. The Birds that passed his perch said: “Come with us”; but he said: “I am a Beast.”
Later on, some Beasts who were passing underneath him looked up and said: “Come with us”; but he said: “I am a Bird.”
Luckily at the last moment peace was made, and no battle took place, so the Bat came to the Birds and wished to join in the rejoicings, but they all turned against him and he had to fly away. He then went to the Beasts, but soon had to beat a retreat, or else they would have torn him to pieces. “Ah,” said the Bat, “I see now, “He that is neither one thing nor the other has no friends.”fablesofaesop.com/the-bat-birds-and-the-beasts.html |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2017 2:45:22 GMT
Chris, I don't know how I feel about you anymore. It's probably safest to regard you as a wildcard emotionally speaking. Why? Because he's not a sycophant who agrees with everything you say? Because he thinks logically? Because he weighs all angles? Hey, I don't agree with him all the time either but our pal Chrispy ain't no dummy. He's a fence sitter and he moves where the wind blows him that day but I am certain if you were loyal to him, he would have been loyal to you. But you weren't. Once Chrispy trusts, he TRUSTS and he won't waver. It just takes him a while to get there. Just my observation from afar, anyway. Chrispy gets fed up. He sees people acting stupid and he just gets fed up. There's so many contradictions within that post.... |
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 18, 2017 2:47:11 GMT
Why don't I trust him anymore? Simple as this: because he doesn't care. And friends don't give friends apathy. If he has a problem with me, talking is the right way to handle it, not forging alliances and making public goodbye letters. That's just being an asshole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 18, 2017 8:37:12 GMT
Why don't I trust him anymore? Simple as this: because he doesn't care. And friends don't give friends apathy. If he has a problem with me, talking is the right way to handle it, not forging alliances and making public goodbye letters. That's just being an asshole. I do not have a problem with you and if I did I would tell you anyway. I do care about you but to be honest, I am not sure what I am supposed to do. I do not speak poorly of you ever and I trust you, so that is what I am in control of. I have forged no alliances with anyone, I mean I thought I did with you but I can understand why you would not trust me. Perhaps it is best this way, at least for now until you feel like you do not have to trust me.
I was in the wrong for deleting my account the last time around and it does bother me that I made a huge error in judgement. I want to apologise for that. It doesn't change anything, but I do understand it hurt you.
Now I do not fence sit either, I have always been 'on your side'. This does not mean I am not going to think for myself, but it does mean I will try and figure things out with you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Apr 18, 2017 16:40:28 GMT
Why don't I trust him anymore? Simple as this: because he doesn't care. And friends don't give friends apathy. If he has a problem with me, talking is the right way to handle it, not forging alliances and making public goodbye letters. That's just being an asshole. I do not have a problem with you and if I did I would tell you anyway. I do care about you but to be honest, I am not sure what I am supposed to do. I do not speak poorly of you ever and I trust you, so that is what I am in control of. I have forged no alliances with anyone, I mean I thought I did with you but I can understand why you would not trust me. Perhaps it is best this way, at least for now until you feel like you do not have to trust me.
I was in the wrong for deleting my account the last time around and it does bother me that I made a huge error in judgement. I want to apologise for that. It doesn't change anything, but I do understand it hurt you.
Now I do not fence sit either, I have always been 'on your side'. This does not mean I am not going to think for myself, but it does mean I will try and figure things out with you.
I respect all of that Chrispy. Honor it and respect it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2017 19:40:19 GMT
Hmmm I've been watching the interplay with the one called Chris/Chrispy. Hello, Chris. He speaks as a friend and then brings up an enemy when things were getting quiet. The unnamed ones also laud him a bit overly so. Says he'll leave and then comes back to gently stir the pot. Perhaps in this case good cop and bad cop are the same cop.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 18, 2017 20:09:34 GMT
Hmmm I've been watching the interplay with the one called Chris/Chrispy. Hello, Chris. He speaks as a friend and then brings up an enemy when things were getting quiet. The unnamed ones also laud him a bit overly so. Says he'll leave and then comes back to gently stir the pot. Perhaps in this case good cop and bad cop are the same cop. Who exactly is the enemy and are you sure they are my enemy. Once you have double checked the Universe does not revolve solely around your illusions, then perhaps you can see what is there and not what you think is there. It seems to me like you Andrea are trying to stir the pot here with your insinuations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2017 20:16:34 GMT
Hmmm I've been watching the interplay with the one called Chris/Chrispy. Hello, Chris. He speaks as a friend and then brings up an enemy when things were getting quiet. The unnamed ones also laud him a bit overly so. Says he'll leave and then comes back to gently stir the pot. Perhaps in this case good cop and bad cop are the same cop. Who exactly is the enemy and are you sure they are my enemy. Once you have double checked the Universe does not revolve solely around your illusions, then perhaps you can see what is there and not what you think is there. It seems to me like you Andrea are trying to stir the pot here with your insinuations.
Well, maybe so. I drew lines once I was rather maliciously attacked by some anonymous person or persons who claimed to follow Merit. I did not attack at all in fact. I was merely defending the horrible personal attacks on Caylus and then further on Zen on another forum. If the mythical Merit does not wish to create enemies, then perhaps he and his companions can communicate peacefully. Tit for tat is very Old Testament. YHVH is gone. |
|
|
|
Post by goop on Apr 18, 2017 20:22:34 GMT
Why don't I trust him anymore? Simple as this: because he doesn't care. And friends don't give friends apathy. If he has a problem with me, talking is the right way to handle it, not forging alliances and making public goodbye letters. That's just being an asshole. I do not have a problem with you and if I did I would tell you anyway. I do care about you but to be honest, I am not sure what I am supposed to do. I do not speak poorly of you ever and I trust you, so that is what I am in control of. I have forged no alliances with anyone, I mean I thought I did with you but I can understand why you would not trust me. Perhaps it is best this way, at least for now until you feel like you do not have to trust me.
I was in the wrong for deleting my account the last time around and it does bother me that I made a huge error in judgement. I want to apologise for that. It doesn't change anything, but I do understand it hurt you.
Now I do not fence sit either, I have always been 'on your side'. This does not mean I am not going to think for myself, but it does mean I will try and figure things out with you.
Caylus, that is nasty words to say about a guy who openly supported you through a LOT of bullshit. Wow. Is it true that after you saw him talking to Merit and Mila on GLP you stopped talking to him? That's an asshole move. I think he does care. I think he cares a lot. But I think he reaches his tolerance threshold and you wouldn't be saying any of this to him if he had decided to be anti-M&M with you guys. The reason you are angry with him is because he didn't try to appease you. A good friend does not always agree with you especially when the friend sees you are spiralling out of control. A good friend speaks up. A good friend points out the truth to you when you can't see the forest for the trees anymore. Do you want a friend or an enabler? I think you know what an enabler is, right? Because that's what Chris never did--he never enabled you. |
|
|
|
Post by goop on Apr 18, 2017 20:23:42 GMT
Hmmm I've been watching the interplay with the one called Chris/Chrispy. Hello, Chris. He speaks as a friend and then brings up an enemy when things were getting quiet. The unnamed ones also laud him a bit overly so. Says he'll leave and then comes back to gently stir the pot. Perhaps in this case good cop and bad cop are the same cop. Again, this comes down to you people (most of you) being suspicious and negative towards anyone who disagrees with you. Cult-ish. Very. |
|
|
|
Post by goop on Apr 18, 2017 20:26:26 GMT
Who exactly is the enemy and are you sure they are my enemy. Once you have double checked the Universe does not revolve solely around your illusions, then perhaps you can see what is there and not what you think is there. It seems to me like you Andrea are trying to stir the pot here with your insinuations.
Well, maybe so. I drew lines once I was rather maliciously attacked by some anonymous person or persons who claimed to follow Merit. I did not attack at all in fact. I was merely defending the horrible personal attacks on Caylus and then further on Zen on another forum. If the mythical Merit does not wish to create enemies, then perhaps he and his companions can communicate peacefully. Tit for tat is very Old Testament. YHVH is gone. Your assumptions. No one claimed to be a "follower" of Merit and you have no idea who "attacked" you. For all you know, it could be some random asshole M&M don't even know. I am fairly certain Merit does not give a fuck about you, Andrea. You have allowed yourself to be convinced of something that is not facts, but rather just some poorly formed opinion based on hearsay and assumptions. You are just part of the blind leading the blind. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2017 20:33:47 GMT
Well, maybe so. I drew lines once I was rather maliciously attacked by some anonymous person or persons who claimed to follow Merit. I did not attack at all in fact. I was merely defending the horrible personal attacks on Caylus and then further on Zen on another forum. If the mythical Merit does not wish to create enemies, then perhaps he and his companions can communicate peacefully. Tit for tat is very Old Testament. YHVH is gone. Your assumptions. No one claimed to be a "follower" of Merit and you have no idea who "attacked" you. For all you know, it could be some random asshole M&M don't even know. I am fairly certain Merit does not give a fuck about you, Andrea. You have allowed yourself to be convinced of something that is not facts, but rather just some poorly formed opinion based on hearsay and assumptions. You are just part of the blind leading the blind. We are just friends really. And you're right about me calling those who defended Merit as "followers." I was wrong to do so. I have never met Merit. I have no idea if he actually has followers or not. The ACs were just ACs with words that attacked in Merit's name. I'm sure he does not care who I am. I am merely attempting to help my friends. |
|
