Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 23:00:35 GMT
Perhaps millennials discover and explore the realms of minimalism, thus winning in quality of experiencing the realm that is haptic to your hands. Competition in itself must not remain a common modus operandi, as this would swallow the ground we do walk on, if it does not smooth out. The paradigms that rule since industrialization, have to change and adjust, otherwise humans will cease to exist within the next 200 years, if not earlier. Unlimited growth equals cancer. It does kill the host. Millennials are being Forced to accept Minimalism as a Standard of Life The Vacuum sucking resources to the top.. leaves the meek with nothing Either you play as a gangsta.. or you will just be destined to be an internet pranksta Obama believed Collaboration will win out over Competition as the human phase that eventually will win I do prefer collaboration. Win-win, and it must not depend on money either. Competition was dominant for so long, collaboration is logical for the pendulum to swing then.
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Mar 12, 2017 23:01:33 GMT
Also many millennials are genetically a different species DNA Mutations are converting some bloodlines into the Autistic Spectrum Bloodlines This conversion was done.. to get that generation ready for the Age of the Internet You mean Aldous Huxley Brave New World-like? Functional Bloodlines for Careers.. and Planning Society as a whole Scientist Bloodlines Internet Coding Bloodlines Sex Slave Bloodlines Elite Bloodlines All will form.. generation after generation.. Creating very Specifically Specified Bloodline Coagulation..
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Mar 12, 2017 23:04:03 GMT
Millennials are being Forced to accept Minimalism as a Standard of Life The Vacuum sucking resources to the top.. leaves the meek with nothing Either you play as a gangsta.. or you will just be destined to be an internet pranksta Obama believed Collaboration will win out over Competition as the human phase that eventually will win I do prefer collaboration. Win-win, and it must not depend on money either. Competition was dominant for so long, collaboration is logical for the pendulum to swing then. Even Rooting for Collaboration over Competition is essentially a Competition Which is the irony of the goal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 23:20:56 GMT
You mean Aldous Huxley Brave New World-like? Functional Bloodlines for Careers.. and Planning Society as a whole Scientist Bloodlines Internet Coding Bloodlines Sex Slave Bloodlines Elite Bloodlines All will form.. generation after generation.. Creating very Specifically Specified Bloodline Coagulation.. Ain´t that one sided on the long run, and doesn´t bias lead to degeneration and regression because of it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2017 23:23:34 GMT
I do prefer collaboration. Win-win, and it must not depend on money either. Competition was dominant for so long, collaboration is logical for the pendulum to swing then. Even Rooting for Collaboration over Competition is essentially a Competition Which is the irony of the goal Hmmm, can´t competition find its expression in some fields, while others remain free of that? I think, people are able to compromise. At least I do hope so.
|
|
|
Post by Caylus Ark on Mar 12, 2017 23:23:59 GMT
Point taken, and sometimes I actually do when watching TV. It has become so seldom, I did forget that. Tonight tho, in 45 minutes, I´ll be watching Robocop, the version with Gary Oldman and . Now imagine when your mind can shape the 'shows' you are watching.. What you think.. the actors will say What you feel.. the actors will kneel I'm actually pretty sure reality does work that way.
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Mar 13, 2017 0:43:24 GMT
Functional Bloodlines for Careers.. and Planning Society as a whole Scientist Bloodlines Internet Coding Bloodlines Sex Slave Bloodlines Elite Bloodlines All will form.. generation after generation.. Creating very Specifically Specified Bloodline Coagulation.. Ain´t that one sided on the long run, and doesn´t bias lead to degeneration and regression because of it? As the most functional society.. specialization is the best As the most interesting society.. diversification is the best Depends if you view yourself as the World Bloodline Engineer Or if you enjoy the variety and unpredictability of less controls Both methods have been tried.. both work.. but a choice at the top must be made
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Mar 13, 2017 0:46:47 GMT
Even Rooting for Collaboration over Competition is essentially a Competition Which is the irony of the goal Hmmm, can´t competition find its expression in some fields, while others remain free of that? I think, people are able to compromise. At least I do hope so. Ever seen a Vin Diagram.. at some point.. they will meet And the Competition Side will dominate the Collaboration Side
|
|
|
Post by OYE on Mar 13, 2017 0:48:53 GMT
Now imagine when your mind can shape the 'shows' you are watching.. What you think.. the actors will say What you feel.. the actors will kneel I'm actually pretty sure reality does work that way. Lot of truth in this scene..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2017 0:58:16 GMT
Ain´t that one sided on the long run, and doesn´t bias lead to degeneration and regression because of it? As the most functional society.. specialization is the best As the most interesting society.. diversification is the best Depends if you view yourself as the World Bloodline Engineer Or if you enjoy the variety and unpredictability of less controls Both methods have been tried.. both work.. but a choice at the top must be made I am a hybrid, so I opt for diversification. I grew up with lots of variety and feel uncomfortable amidst conformity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2017 1:05:09 GMT
Hmmm, can´t competition find its expression in some fields, while others remain free of that? I think, people are able to compromise. At least I do hope so. Ever seen a Vin Diagram.. at some point.. they will meet And the Competition Side will dominate the Collaboration Side No I didn´t, dunno what that is either. The pillars framing the throne look very dna spiral-ish in that clip. You keep what you kill, does refer to the (still active?) habit of eating slain opponents organs, like heart and brain, as to literally incorporate their traits. Same goes for eating animals I guess. Wasn´t there the story of Charlie Sheen drinking tiger blood? Can´t that apply without killing by means of homeopathic treatment?!
|
|